Hi Dennis,
Thanks for your input, my comments inline.
On 11/28/2015 02:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Hi Carl,
Thanks for taking this on.
Some observations/questions inline.
- Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 06:35
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars
to Apache Nexus repository
Hi All,
I'm finally getting a chance to work on the Maven packaging for the Java
UNO jar files. As part of this effort we need to submit a POM xml file
with org information.
Please review the sample below and let me know if you agree before I
bundle and load them to the staging area of the repository and call for
a vote.
The requirements are listed here [1] and the OpenOffice.org wiki page
for the 3.2.1 files are here [2]. This is the page I plan on updating
with new procedures.
This example is for the ridl.jar file. In particular groupId, url,
license, scm, and developer.
Developer is now required so I put myself there as I don't know who is.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";>
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>org.apache.openoffice</groupId>
<artifactId>ridl</artifactId>
<version>4.1.2</version>
<packaging>jar</packaging>
<name>Java Runtime Interface Definition Library</name>
<description>The type library and the precompiled Java interfaces of
the UDK API.</description>
<url>http://openoffice.apache.org</url>
[orcmid]
I think a more-specific URL is needed to line up with the Artifact. The use of
openoffice.apache.org seems too high-level (and is not openoffice.org better,
although not the group name?). Is it useful to have more context in the <name>
of the project artifact? Is this part of UDK? I think the question to ask is, what
are we helping someone to find.
[cmarcum]
The 3.2.1 jars used http://udk.openoffice.org for the URL which now
resolves to http://www.openoffice.org/udk so I can use that instead.
The name is the same as the jar in the AOO distribution and consistint
with previous 3.2.1 release to maven during OpenOffice.org
When referenced in a Maven POM the name will be prefixed with the
groupId which has been 'org.openoffice' previously.
Would it be better to keep it that way or if org.apache.openoffice is to
high level we could make it 'org.apache.openoffice.udk'?
<http://udk.openoffice.org>
<licenses>
<license>
<name>The Apache License, Version 2.0</name>
<url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
</license>
</licenses>
<developers>
<developer>
<name>Carl Marcum</name>
<email>cmar...@apache.org</email>
<organization>Apache Software Foundation</organization>
<organizationUrl>http://www.apache.org</organizationUrl>
</developer>
[orcmid]
Since we cannot name all of the developers, I think a group developer might be
better. That is,
<developer>
<name>Apache OpenOffice Project</name>
<email>dev@openoffice.apache.org</email>
</developer>
This should line up better with the standard project notice on the source files.
You could even have this in addition to your entry. It might be useful to have
yours there as distribution [release] manager.
[cmarcum]
That's good, I will add the group also.
</developers>
<scm>
<connection>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk</connection
<developerConnection>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk</
developerConnection>
<url>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk</url>
[orcmid]
Linking to the repository trunk seems too high level. Is there a closer URL
for the repository for the (buildable) source of the artifact?
[cmarcum]
Yes,
<url>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/ridljar</url>
is closer.
juh.jar will be ../main/javaunohelper
jurt.jar will be ../main/jurt
officebean.jar will be ../main/bean
The one that is different is unoil.jar which has no Java sources but is
generated from IDL files.
however ../main/unoil dir does exist and contains makefiles.
</scm>
<dependencies>
<!-- none -->
</dependencies>
</project>
[1] http://central.sonatype.org/pages/requirements.html
[2] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Java/MavenBundles
[orcmid]
Will you link to the wiki page [2]? If so, please link to a specific history
page, since there can be changes for future distributions, just as this is a
change over the past.
[cmarcum]
I don't think there is a tag I can use to link to that page from the POM
file.
If you mean when I edit the page for the updates then yes, no problem or
I can leave the 3.2.1 stuff at the bottom of the page and label it as such.
Thanks,
Carl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Thanks,
Carl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
