I do not feel good with these claims, but I am fine to use them. On 19.09.19 14:21, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Am 19.09.19 um 14:17 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: >> Hello and thank you very much. >> >> There is only one question left: >> >> Am 19.09.19 um 13:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> >>>> Description of project(s) for publication: >>>> >>>> Apache OpenOffice is the Free and Open Productivity Suite to handle >>>> office tasks. The roots of Apache OpenOffice go back more than twenty >>>> years, creating a mature and powerful product. >>> Apache OpenOffice is a Free and Open Productivity Suite to handle >>> office tasks. The roots of Apache OpenOffice go back more than twenty >>> years, creating a mature and powerful product. >>> >> "The Free and Open Productivity Suite" is our claim. > If we use it as a term like above it makes sense... > > What do others think? > > Regards, > > Matthias > >> The other Free office suite claims: "Fun Project" and "Fantastic People". >> >> Their advertisement is: >> >> "LibreOffice 6: >> "The best office suite gets even better" – ZDNet" >> >> Is there a reason not use our claim? (Which is also printed on our roll up.) >> >> Kind regards >> Michael >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
