I just wanted to say in a complicated way that I told what I knew. And I
don't think it is worth to do a lot of research to convince others.
Am 30.04.20 um 00:41 schrieb Marcus:
Am 29.04.20 um 12:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Please understand that I assume a per default some resistance towards
change. I see it as feature not as failure, we are a bit conservative
for a reason.
But as a reaction I save my time a bit, where I think it is a waste.
I don't understand what you want to tell me here as this is out of
context.
So which Information do you exactly need?
Actually I cannot really help here as I'm not a developer. However I
would think that it is helping more to tell some more background of
the potential removal candidate. Thats all. ;-)
Thanks
Marcus
Am 29.04.20 um 00:56 schrieb Marcus:
Am 25.04.20 um 03:50 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I would like to remove stlport from code. We already build without
it, and no one is using it. We have a Repository system for
managing old code. We do not need to carry stuff we do not use.
Another potential candidate to get Rid of is beanshell. I am
looking into it, the project moved to Apache Commons. I hope that
it is still there under a different name (beanUtil?)
Cleaning out stuff is important.
right.
Howeverr, when you write for which the ressources are used it would
be easier to judge if it can be really dropped or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
