https://infra.apache.org/code-signing-access.html

> On Sep 10, 2026, at 1:36 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> How can that be? Apple signing doesn't use a service afaik. 
> 
>> On Sep 10, 2026, at 1:33 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Am 10.09.2026 um 16:32 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> I believe that is just w/ Windows signing, and not Apple.
>> 
>> That was true but even that changed when we switched the service.
>> 
>> I need to experiment a bit around. I would like to keep the signing as part 
>> of the build.
>> 
>> But maybe add it as Flag. Not sure, what is best. cool would be if you could 
>> reference the key to use with -signkey="key name"
>> If the Flag is not given the package is not signed. Maybe that could be nice 
>> for all build targets. Independant if windows, Linux or Mac.
>> In case of Linux would be maybe nice for flatpack or snap.
>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 10, 2026, at 10:15 AM, Dave Fisher <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Unless things have changed signing with ASF credentials is not free. If 
>>>> continuing with Peter’s plan then a distinction needs to be made between 
>>>> signing a developer’s or ci build, and signing a release build.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 10, 2026, at 4:24 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Whatever you want. I'm done.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sep 10, 2026, at 6:54 AM, Peter Kovacs <[email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Am 10. September 2026 12:24:19 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski 
>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>>>>> On our builds, yes of course. But we should not force someone who 
>>>>>>> downloads the source and builds for themselves to also sign that.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Traditionally, we've always signed after we build as a separate process 
>>>>>>> from building the community build DMGs.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hopefully that's a bit more clear :)
>>>>>> Ok. And what solution do you propose?
>>>>>> Apple says packaging involves signing. You can not change that.
>>>>>> I am for we release proper signed software or none at all. There is no 
>>>>>> in between anymore.
>>>>>>>> On Sep 10, 2026, at 5:59 AM, Peter Kovacs <[email protected] 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Am 10. September 2026 11:47:21 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski 
>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>>>>>>> I can't imagine the regular user wanting/needing to sign...
>>>>>>>> Sorry maybe I was not clear.
>>>>>>>> I think we should enforce signing on all builds.
>>>>>>>> The user can always see if that build is from us or someone else. 
>>>>>>>> Development builds will always trigger the gatekeeper.
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 10, 2026, at 5:38 AM, Peter Kovacs <[email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Am 10. September 2026 11:30:18 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski 
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>>>>>>>>> I am also wondering if the actual signing script itself should be 
>>>>>>>>>>> in devtools, somewhere under release-scripts instead.
>>>>>>>>>> The process ist to sign the app, then package the image, and then 
>>>>>>>>>> you need to sign again.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I would rather enforce signing to be mandatory.
>>>>>>>>>> What we could put into Devtools maybe is the notarize of the 
>>>>>>>>>> installer. Which publishes the release at Apple. I guess. And then 
>>>>>>>>>> we could think about a process to publish in the store.
>>>>>>>>>>> Cool work.
>>>>>>>>>> Yes. I hope this will
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 10, 2026, at 5:14 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any way you could pull out just the signing bits into a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> separate commit?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 10, 2026, at 12:26 AM, [email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Jim
>>>>>>>>>>> "This is an outrage!"
>>>>>>>>>>>                  Tony Harrison
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Jim
>>>>>>>>> "This is an outrage!"
>>>>>>>>>                   Tony Harrison
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jim
>>>>>>> "This is an outrage!"
>>>>>>>                    Tony Harrison
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jim
>>>>> "This is an outrage!"
>>>>>                      Tony Harrison
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> --
>>> Jim
>>>  "This is an outrage!"
>>>                        Tony Harrison
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
> --
> Jim
>  "This is an outrage!"
>                        Tony Harrison
> 

--
Jim
  "This is an outrage!"
                        Tony Harrison

Reply via email to