Thorsten Behrens wrote, On 03/03/08 17:21: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 04:08:16PM +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: >>> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:37 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: >>>> what are your opinions on making java 1.5 a requirement for OOo 3.0? >>> Unfavorable. >>> (this is a personal opinion) >> If -and only if- this question is framed in that way, I am also >> unfavorable. AFAICT java is not required for OOo to run. >> > Yep. The party line up to now was to have Java used for > non-essential, non-core features.
Yes. That's the way it works nowadays, and we shouldn't change that. Requiring Java for an OOo core feature like ODF 1.2 Meta Data support is a no-no, IMHO. Malte. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
