Seems we have to distinguish here a little bit:

It is NOT acceptable for me if I (silently) loose the meta data when not
having Java. Data must be kept when loading/manipulating/storing the
doc, and the user should be able to see that/where extra data is.

It IS acceptable for me if Java is required for writing Plugins to
manipulate meta data or advanced features. Then I also have no objection
to raise the requirement from Java 1.4 to 1.5.

Probably it needs some more discussion to define the requirements what
exactly must be possible w/o having Java, and how the user can see
existing meta data in some way then.

Malte.




Malte Timmermann wrote, On 03/03/08 17:36:
> 
> Thorsten Behrens wrote, On 03/03/08 17:21:
>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 04:08:16PM +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:37 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
>>>>> what are your opinions on making java 1.5 a requirement for OOo 3.0?
>>>> Unfavorable.
>>>> (this is a personal opinion)
>>> If -and only if- this question is framed in that way, I am also  
>>> unfavorable. AFAICT java is not required for OOo to run.
>>>
>> Yep. The party line up to now was to have Java used for
>> non-essential, non-core features. 
> 
> Yes. That's the way it works nowadays, and we shouldn't change that.
> 
> Requiring Java for an OOo core feature like ODF 1.2 Meta Data support is
> a no-no, IMHO.
> 
> Malte.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to