Seems we have to distinguish here a little bit: It is NOT acceptable for me if I (silently) loose the meta data when not having Java. Data must be kept when loading/manipulating/storing the doc, and the user should be able to see that/where extra data is.
It IS acceptable for me if Java is required for writing Plugins to manipulate meta data or advanced features. Then I also have no objection to raise the requirement from Java 1.4 to 1.5. Probably it needs some more discussion to define the requirements what exactly must be possible w/o having Java, and how the user can see existing meta data in some way then. Malte. Malte Timmermann wrote, On 03/03/08 17:36: > > Thorsten Behrens wrote, On 03/03/08 17:21: >> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 04:08:16PM +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:37 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: >>>>> what are your opinions on making java 1.5 a requirement for OOo 3.0? >>>> Unfavorable. >>>> (this is a personal opinion) >>> If -and only if- this question is framed in that way, I am also >>> unfavorable. AFAICT java is not required for OOo to run. >>> >> Yep. The party line up to now was to have Java used for >> non-essential, non-core features. > > Yes. That's the way it works nowadays, and we shouldn't change that. > > Requiring Java for an OOo core feature like ODF 1.2 Meta Data support is > a no-no, IMHO. > > Malte. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]