Nils Fuhrmann wrote: > I know that there were some issue regarding QA'ing buildbot builds in > past. To get an idea what the real problem is, we should collect those > issues in detail when they occur to find the root cause for them (as we > always do). If those issues still are existent, I would await that this > list is already available somewhere (Mechtilde, do you have such list?). > Hi Nils, *,
I would expect to *always* have subtle (or not so subtle) differences in the build, *as long* as we don't converge to exactly one build system (whatever that might look, not necessarily buildbots). That would be fixing the root cause, in my book. > Really, we should investigate into the concrete list of issues before > thinking about any additional infrastructure. So if such list of issues > is available, I will ask someone of my team to take a look on it. > In concur with Andre. I guess it's about using the existing infrastructure properly - why not setup a buildbot with the exact HH Linux buildenv (publish that as a VM/VirtualBox image at the same time), and keep it in sync with internal builds (of course, having RelEng build on that very same machine/setup would nicely ensure that this is the case)? Cheers, -- Thorsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
