On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:57:12 +0100 Thorsten Behrens <t...@openoffice.org> wrote:
> sure, I buy those. Would then be worthwhile to re-def the types you > listed in terms of their C/std:: counterparts. Can do that. > sal_sChar is indeed unused, sal_uChar not so much (but there should > be a trivial 1:1 mapping). > > Or better even, mass-move things like sal_Size/PtrDiff over to > size_t etc. Moving things over to std. c++ is of course preferable. But at least we should kill of defines that are unused and of questionable value (like sal_sChar) _right_ _now_ as that is easy to do and otherwise they will be used sooner or later. BR, Bjoern --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
