On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:05:24 +0100 Thorsten Behrens <t...@openoffice.org> wrote:
> I'd therefore like to revisit the OOo coding standards > (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Category:Coding_Standards), > and ideally merge the non-controversial stuff from > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/Code_Conventions > with the overall rules. +1 in general for this. However, the little word "non-controversial" might cover the next epic flamewar after SCM and build system. For me, most of the stuff in the writer code conventions are non-controversial(*) as I wrote most of the stuff. ;) Still, how do we ensure that the conventions are actually better applied? Its nice that we have them, but they are of little use, if they are commonly ignored. BR, Bjoern (*) Exception: The stuff about constants might need to be reworked with ALLCAPS being reserved for the preprocessor. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
