On Mar 11, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
On Wednesday, 2010-03-10 15:35:44 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
hmm... and what about this crapfest:
/tools/inc/tools/solar.h
uhm... typedef int FASTBOOL ? seriously?
Yes. With Win16 on 486 processors or some such ... passing an int was
faster than a char (BOOL) and C++ bool didn't even exist for all
compilers. Feel free to get rid of that crap ;-)
And while you are at it also replace the countless methods that still
use sal_uInt16 instead of int as return value... goodbye Win3.1! ;-)
Using the state-of-the-art new-fangled 16bit values then was probably
from the same ruleset that Thorsten insists on being state-of-the-art
today ;-)
---
Herbert Duerr
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
