>>>Is that acceptable for a milestone release?
Samples are given as a source not as a binary. Its the user responsibility
to setup correct maven repository in his/her environments.  I think that
this is not a release stopper issue.

Thanks;

--Gurkan

2010/3/3 Joseph Bergmark <bergm...@apache.org>

> It looks like you need to add the JBoss repo both for the samples to work
> from the binary archives, and for the source archives to build.  Is that
> acceptable for a milestone release?
>
> I ran the reservation sample from a seperate machine (that didn't have
> javaassist 3.11.0 in my local .m2 already), and I'm not seeing the NPE in
> reservation once I added the jboss repositories to the pom.xml.  That
> problem does appear to have been isolated to my development machine.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joe
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hey!
> >
> > As a side note, the LICENCE file contains "Copyright [yyyy] [name of
> > copyright owner]".
> > Dunno if it's important for a milestone release.
> >
> > To make samples working, you should add Gurkan's repo and JBoss repo
> > cause javassist 3.11.0.GA is not available in central.
> > Already discussed that point with Mark. I'll try to push javassist
> > 3.11 to central repo.
> >
> > jsf2sample: missing version in plugin jetty (same for
> > conversation-sample - at least).
> >
> > In my opinion, it'd be great to add a plugin management section in the
> > sample parent pom defining jetty plugin version.
> >
> > Good job guys.
> > Jean-Louis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2010/3/2 Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com>:
> > > 1* For errors: I have tried from source, binaries and tag versions. All
> > of them have worked.
> > >    Did the following
> > >    * Remove ~/.m2/repositories/org/apache/openwebbeans
> > >    * Add the following to reservation/pom.xml to use staged maven
> modules
> > >      <repositories>
> > >                <repository>
> > >                    <id>sddfsnapshots.jboss.org</id>
> > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/<http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/>
> > >                </repository>
> > >            </repositories>
> > >   * mvn clean jetty:run -Pjetty
> > >   * It works
> > >
> > > Also tried from distribution source version, and install it.
> > > Also tried tag version.
> > >
> > > All of them work in my machine JDK 1.6.0_14,  Ubuntu 8.04  - the Hardy
> > Heron, Apache Maven 2.2.1
> > >
> > > 2* For second, repositories related with Jboss and third parties
> > generally setup on settings.xml instead of in pom.xml. Therefore we
> remove
> > JBoss related repos from pom.xml. But as you said, it is beneficial to
> > commen those repositories in README file. We can touch it on next
> release. I
> > think it is not a negative impact on vote. (Actually this repos are
> related
> > with TCK packages that are not directly used by users)
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks;
> > >
> > > --Gurkan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Joseph Bergmark <bergm...@apache.org>
> > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > > Sent: Wed, March 3, 2010 12:24:34 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-M4
> > >
> > > I was able to verify the signature of the source and binary files.
> >  However
> > > I've run into a couple of problems
> > >
> > > 1) I added the M4 staging repo to the pom.xml of a couple of the
> samples
> > > from the binary tar.gz and ran them to ensure they worked as expected.
> >  Both
> > > guess and jsf2sample worked fine, however when I tried to follow the
> "Not
> > a
> > > registered! Register here...<
> > http://localhost:8080/reservation/register.jsf>"
> > > in the reservation sample I hit a NPE:
> > >
> > > Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
> > >    at
> > org.apache.webbeans.reservation.util.LogUtil.getLogger(LogUtil.java:33)
> > >    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > >    at
> >
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:48)
> > >    at
> >
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37)
> > >    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:600)
> > >    at
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.inject.InjectableMethods.doInjection(InjectableMethods.java:117)
> > >    at
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.component.ProducerMethodBean.createDefaultInstance(ProducerMethodBean.java:184)
> > >    at
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.component.ProducerMethodBean.createInstance(ProducerMethodBean.java:151)
> > >    at
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.component.AbstractOwbBean.create(AbstractOwbBean.java:153)
> > >    at
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.context.DependentContext.getInstance(DependentContext.java:65)
> > >    at
> > org.apache.webbeans.context.AbstractContext.get(AbstractContext.java:151)
> > >    at
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.getReference(BeanManagerImpl.java:784)
> > >
> > > I did a bit of debugging, and it appears the injected InjectionPoint is
> > > null.
> > >
> > > Gurkan is not able to reproduce this error, so it is possibly something
> > > specific to my environment.  Is anyone else seeing this problem?  I'll
> > try
> > > it on another machine later tonight.
> > >
> > > 2) I then tried to build from the source zip, and hit a missing
> > dependency
> > > executing "mvn clean install" from the top level openwebbeans
> directory:
> > > Missing:
> > > ----------
> > > 1) org.jboss.test-harness:jboss-test-harness-api:jar:1.1.0-CR5
> > >
> > > It appears this comes from the 299 TCK:
> > >
> > > Path to dependency:
> > >      1) org.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-porting:jar:1.0.0-M4
> > >      2) org.jboss.jsr299.tck:jsr299-tck-api:jar:1.0.1-Final
> > >      3) org.jboss.test-harness:jboss-test-harness-api:jar:1.1.0-CR5
> > >
> > > Should we document that JBoss repositories need to be added to your
> local
> > > settings for the source zip to build?  I know we removed some
> > repositories
> > > from the top level pom.xml.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Joe
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> > wrote:
> > >> > +1 from me too.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > PS: @OWB-289: since I now know _what_ the problem is, it  is really
> > easy
> > >> to do a workaround by moving my other producerMethod to an own class.
> > The
> > >> problem was that this is part of a pretty complicated usecase, and I
> > only
> > >> did see my program fail randomly, which made me frankly said a bit
> > nervous
> > >>  ;)
> > >> >
> > >> > LieGrue,
> > >> > strub
> > >> >
> > >> > --- Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> schrieb am Mo,
> 1.3.2010:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Von: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com>
> > >> >> Betreff: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-M4
> > >> >> An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > >> >> Datum: Montag, 1. März, 2010 21:52 Uhr
> > >> >> Hi;
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Finally  release time  :)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> This is the OpenWebBeans M4 release [VOTE] process.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I've staged the releases artifacts here:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Plugins repository
> > >> >> --------------------------
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans<http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans>
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
> >
> > <
> >
> http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
> > >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Distribution content
> > >> >> ----------------------------
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-M4/<http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-M4/>
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-M4/
> >
> > <
> >
> http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-M4/
> > >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> SVN Tag (Revision: 917708)
> > >> >> ----------------------------
> > >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/1.0.0-M4/
> > >> >>
> > >> >> This is the README file for the M4 release for quick
> > >> >> review:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/1.0.0-M4/readme/README_M4.txt
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Please verify that this release package is correct and vote
> > >> >> for the
> > >> >> motion to publish this as a OpenWebBeans M4 release.
> > >> >> All votes are welcome and will be counted.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> VOTE is open for 72 hours
> > >> >>
> > >> >> This is my +1
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks;
> > >> >>
> > >> >> /Gurkan
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> ___________________________________________________________________
> > >> >> Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
> > >> >> İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye
> > >> >> sizlere sunuyor!
> > >> >
> > >> > __________________________________________________
> > >> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > >> > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden
> > Schutz
> > >> gegen Massenmails.
> > >> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Matthias Wessendorf
> > >>
> > >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>  ___________________________________________________________________
> > > Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
> > > İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!
> >
>



-- 
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com

Reply via email to