Sounds good to me even if i definitely prefer self contained pom (ie.
avoid necessary information in settings.xml).
As it's not a release stopper issue, here is my

+1

JLouis

2010/3/3 Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com>:
> And also same scenario exists to install from source (setting up some JBoss
> repos on settings.xml). In source version, we just tag the source from
> /trunk. This is also valid for us, committers. If we have not set those
> repos in settings.xml, not compile.
>
> We could add some comments to README on BUILD from source at next release.
>
> --Gurkan
>
> 03 Mart 2010 17:17 tarihinde Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com>yazdı:
>
>> >>>Is that acceptable for a milestone release?
>> Samples are given as a source not as a binary. Its the user responsibility
>> to setup correct maven repository in his/her environments.  I think that
>> this is not a release stopper issue.
>>
>> Thanks;
>>
>> --Gurkan
>>
>> 2010/3/3 Joseph Bergmark <bergm...@apache.org>
>>
>> It looks like you need to add the JBoss repo both for the samples to work
>>> from the binary archives, and for the source archives to build.  Is that
>>> acceptable for a milestone release?
>>>
>>> I ran the reservation sample from a seperate machine (that didn't have
>>> javaassist 3.11.0 in my local .m2 already), and I'm not seeing the NPE in
>>> reservation once I added the jboss repositories to the pom.xml.  That
>>> problem does appear to have been isolated to my development machine.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hey!
>>> >
>>> > As a side note, the LICENCE file contains "Copyright [yyyy] [name of
>>> > copyright owner]".
>>> > Dunno if it's important for a milestone release.
>>> >
>>> > To make samples working, you should add Gurkan's repo and JBoss repo
>>> > cause javassist 3.11.0.GA is not available in central.
>>> > Already discussed that point with Mark. I'll try to push javassist
>>> > 3.11 to central repo.
>>> >
>>> > jsf2sample: missing version in plugin jetty (same for
>>> > conversation-sample - at least).
>>> >
>>> > In my opinion, it'd be great to add a plugin management section in the
>>> > sample parent pom defining jetty plugin version.
>>> >
>>> > Good job guys.
>>> > Jean-Louis
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2010/3/2 Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com>:
>>> > > 1* For errors: I have tried from source, binaries and tag versions.
>>> All
>>> > of them have worked.
>>> > >    Did the following
>>> > >    * Remove ~/.m2/repositories/org/apache/openwebbeans
>>> > >    * Add the following to reservation/pom.xml to use staged maven
>>> modules
>>> > >      <repositories>
>>> > >                <repository>
>>> > >                    <id>sddfsnapshots.jboss.org</id>
>>> > >
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/<http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/>
>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/>
>>> > >                </repository>
>>> > >            </repositories>
>>> > >   * mvn clean jetty:run -Pjetty
>>> > >   * It works
>>> > >
>>> > > Also tried from distribution source version, and install it.
>>> > > Also tried tag version.
>>> > >
>>> > > All of them work in my machine JDK 1.6.0_14,  Ubuntu 8.04  - the Hardy
>>> > Heron, Apache Maven 2.2.1
>>> > >
>>> > > 2* For second, repositories related with Jboss and third parties
>>> > generally setup on settings.xml instead of in pom.xml. Therefore we
>>> remove
>>> > JBoss related repos from pom.xml. But as you said, it is beneficial to
>>> > commen those repositories in README file. We can touch it on next
>>> release. I
>>> > think it is not a negative impact on vote. (Actually this repos are
>>> related
>>> > with TCK packages that are not directly used by users)
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks;
>>> > >
>>> > > --Gurkan
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ________________________________
>>> > > From: Joseph Bergmark <bergm...@apache.org>
>>> > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> > > Sent: Wed, March 3, 2010 12:24:34 AM
>>> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-M4
>>> > >
>>> > > I was able to verify the signature of the source and binary files.
>>> >  However
>>> > > I've run into a couple of problems
>>> > >
>>> > > 1) I added the M4 staging repo to the pom.xml of a couple of the
>>> samples
>>> > > from the binary tar.gz and ran them to ensure they worked as expected.
>>> >  Both
>>> > > guess and jsf2sample worked fine, however when I tried to follow the
>>> "Not
>>> > a
>>> > > registered! Register here...<
>>> > http://localhost:8080/reservation/register.jsf>"
>>> > > in the reservation sample I hit a NPE:
>>> > >
>>> > > Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
>>> > >    at
>>> > org.apache.webbeans.reservation.util.LogUtil.getLogger(LogUtil.java:33)
>>> > >    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>> > >    at
>>> >
>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:48)
>>> > >    at
>>> >
>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37)
>>> > >    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:600)
>>> > >    at
>>> >
>>> org.apache.webbeans.inject.InjectableMethods.doInjection(InjectableMethods.java:117)
>>> > >    at
>>> >
>>> org.apache.webbeans.component.ProducerMethodBean.createDefaultInstance(ProducerMethodBean.java:184)
>>> > >    at
>>> >
>>> org.apache.webbeans.component.ProducerMethodBean.createInstance(ProducerMethodBean.java:151)
>>> > >    at
>>> >
>>> org.apache.webbeans.component.AbstractOwbBean.create(AbstractOwbBean.java:153)
>>> > >    at
>>> >
>>> org.apache.webbeans.context.DependentContext.getInstance(DependentContext.java:65)
>>> > >    at
>>> >
>>> org.apache.webbeans.context.AbstractContext.get(AbstractContext.java:151)
>>> > >    at
>>> >
>>> org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.getReference(BeanManagerImpl.java:784)
>>> > >
>>> > > I did a bit of debugging, and it appears the injected InjectionPoint
>>> is
>>> > > null.
>>> > >
>>> > > Gurkan is not able to reproduce this error, so it is possibly
>>> something
>>> > > specific to my environment.  Is anyone else seeing this problem?  I'll
>>> > try
>>> > > it on another machine later tonight.
>>> > >
>>> > > 2) I then tried to build from the source zip, and hit a missing
>>> > dependency
>>> > > executing "mvn clean install" from the top level openwebbeans
>>> directory:
>>> > > Missing:
>>> > > ----------
>>> > > 1) org.jboss.test-harness:jboss-test-harness-api:jar:1.1.0-CR5
>>> > >
>>> > > It appears this comes from the 299 TCK:
>>> > >
>>> > > Path to dependency:
>>> > >      1) org.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-porting:jar:1.0.0-M4
>>> > >      2) org.jboss.jsr299.tck:jsr299-tck-api:jar:1.0.1-Final
>>> > >      3) org.jboss.test-harness:jboss-test-harness-api:jar:1.1.0-CR5
>>> > >
>>> > > Should we document that JBoss repositories need to be added to your
>>> local
>>> > > settings for the source zip to build?  I know we removed some
>>> > repositories
>>> > > from the top level pom.xml.
>>> > >
>>> > > Sincerely,
>>> > >
>>> > > Joe
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <
>>> mat...@apache.org
>>> > >wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> +1
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >> > +1 from me too.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > PS: @OWB-289: since I now know _what_ the problem is, it  is really
>>> > easy
>>> > >> to do a workaround by moving my other producerMethod to an own class.
>>> > The
>>> > >> problem was that this is part of a pretty complicated usecase, and I
>>> > only
>>> > >> did see my program fail randomly, which made me frankly said a bit
>>> > nervous
>>> > >>  ;)
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > LieGrue,
>>> > >> > strub
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > --- Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> schrieb am Mo,
>>> 1.3.2010:
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >> Von: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com>
>>> > >> >> Betreff: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-M4
>>> > >> >> An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> > >> >> Datum: Montag, 1. März, 2010 21:52 Uhr
>>> > >> >> Hi;
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Finally  release time  :)
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> This is the OpenWebBeans M4 release [VOTE] process.
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> I've staged the releases artifacts here:
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Plugins repository
>>> > >> >> --------------------------
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans<http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans>
>>> <
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
>>> >
>>> > <
>>> >
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
>>> > >
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Distribution content
>>> > >> >> ----------------------------
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-M4/<http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-M4/>
>>> <
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-M4/
>>> >
>>> > <
>>> >
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-M4/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-M4/
>>> > >
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> SVN Tag (Revision: 917708)
>>> > >> >> ----------------------------
>>> > >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/1.0.0-M4/
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> This is the README file for the M4 release for quick
>>> > >> >> review:
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/1.0.0-M4/readme/README_M4.txt
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Please verify that this release package is correct and vote
>>> > >> >> for the
>>> > >> >> motion to publish this as a OpenWebBeans M4 release.
>>> > >> >> All votes are welcome and will be counted.
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> VOTE is open for 72 hours
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> This is my +1
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Thanks;
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> /Gurkan
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >>
>>> ___________________________________________________________________
>>> > >> >> Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
>>> > >> >> İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye
>>> > >> >> sizlere sunuyor!
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > __________________________________________________
>>> > >> > Do You Yahoo!?
>>> > >> > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden
>>> > Schutz
>>> > >> gegen Massenmails.
>>> > >> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Matthias Wessendorf
>>> > >>
>>> > >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> > >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> > >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>  ___________________________________________________________________
>>> > > Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!  http://yahoo.com.tr
>>> > > İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gurkan Erdogdu
>> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Gurkan Erdogdu
> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
>

Reply via email to