Hi, yes [proxy] was in the discussion, the choice will be done depending on benchmarks
- Romain 2012/8/9 Sven Linstaedt <[email protected]> > Hi, sounds like you have something similar to commons-proxy [1] in > mind, when creating an abstraction of the proxy class generation > library. Have you already considered using it? > > br, Sven > > > [1] https://commons.apache.org/proxy/ > > > 2012/8/9 David Blevins <[email protected]>: > > Hey All, > > > > Heads up that I'd like to investigate removing javassist and replacing > it with some simple ASM code to create subclass based proxies. The proxy > code is the small part, the bigger part is refactoring out the > MethodHandler classes and replacing them with > java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler implementations. > > > > As usual I'll probably look for an intermediary step in refactoring it > out, maybe some way to keep the MethodHandlers and get all the code working > with a different proxy impl, then refactor the handlers. > > > > Any thoughts or comments welcome. > > > > > > -David > > >
