+1 LieGrue, strub
> Am 09.01.2017 um 14:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > makes me think we should probably add to the doc a page about meecrowave > target. we played in the microprofile trend but we are not exactly coming > from there actually, wdyt? > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2017-01-09 14:16 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > >> It was mostly discussed on the list and with committs starting with >> October or so. >> >> I also like to emphase that we have the tomcat integration since almost >> the beginning. >> We just missed the bundling. But this was really frequently asked for! >> So from this aspect it's just a small enhancement over what we already do >> since 2009. >> >> But since Tomcat and OWB has different release cycles it did not make >> sense to do it in the owb/trunk but it must get it's own independent >> release cycle. And thus a new SVN root (simply because of how Maven works). >> >> Regarding Incubator or not: Incubator is for new _external_ work. All the >> work of Meecrowave is done by OWB committers inside OWB. And again: it's >> not entirely new but just an enhancement over what we already provided >> since 2009. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >>> Am 09.01.2017 um 09:26 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com >>> : >>> >>> Hi Gurkan, >>> >>> very good question ;) >>> >>> We actually debated more places - think half of the discussion was on IRC >>> but there was a thread there as well. >>> >>> Let me try to summurize it. >>> >>> First of all a quick reminder: meecrowave is first OWB+Tomcat+CXF (before >>> being microprofile which is just a buzz word today and doesn't mean more >>> than this). Said otherwise it is the core of any potential server today >> in >>> a smooth fashion (embeddable, presetup etc). >>> >>> Then in term of where to do it: >>> >>> - incubator: community will be OWB and/or Tomcat and/or CXF -> no point >> to >>> create a new project with the same community (we kind of get this as an >>> issue for several EE sub projects so we tried to avoid it) >>> - Tomcat: not their philosophy and goal to do more than tomcat scope >>> (JAX-RS and CDI are clearly out of their bounds) >>> - CXF: would be a good place but CDI stays core of meecrowave and not >> their >>> central knowledge yet >>> - TomEE: no real force there and TomEE has a few big pitfalls like being >>> associated with a full blown server which make most of its subprojects >>> eliminated before being evaluated even if not accurate >>> - OWB: Tomcat/OWB integration is a real plus for OWB, CXF is likely a "?" >>> but the CXF part is not that much in meecrowave, most of the code is >>> Tomcat/OWB integration and config >>> >>> We had the first discusiion on http://markmail.org/thread/ >> vh6x3u7yt6ex2fp2 >>> IIRC >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >> rmannibucau> | >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory >>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >>> >>> 2017-01-09 9:11 GMT+01:00 Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com. >> invalid>: >>> >>>> Hi all >>>> First of all happy new year! >>>> As I am a founder and keen observer of the project (hope to commit much >>>> more time this year), I would like to ask a question regarding the new >>>> subproject Meecrowave. Why would we create such a sub-project under >>>> OpenWebBeans? From my perspective, OpenWebBeans only aim is to implement >>>> CDI specifications. If we would like to create a such a microprofile >>>> server, we may have to first write an incubator project proposal, >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/ >>>> Moreover, I think that this subproject must be under developed in Apache >>>> TomEE, not in OpenWebBeans. >>>> >>>> Do we have any discussion about this topic in the dev or private list >> that >>>> I did not catch? >>>> Regards. >>>> Gurkan- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
