+1 to Chetan's points. I raised similar points before - even with respect to the API there are some things we would like to change, some of the internal interfaces, and the testing interfaces as well.
I'd rather start with < 1.0 also and work up to a 1.0 release - I think we are all as contributors really proud of what we've built but 1.0 is special and we should hold it back. For reference, https://kafka.apache.org/downloads -r On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Chetan Mehrotra <chetan.mehro...@gmail.com > wrote: > > The version name is called incubator-1.0.0 > > Not yet looked into details but wanted to comment on versioning. May > be we keep it somewhat lower like 0.5.0 or 0.8.0. As we are still > evolving the design wrt various extension points and some of the SPI > interfaces are still evolving. With a 1.0 release we would need to > ensure that all of the APIs are stable and also possibly the SPI > interfaces are also somewhat stable. > > A 1.0 version is special :). So would be better to think what we > consider a 1.0 release in more detail in terms of feature set it > supports. > Chetan Mehrotra > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 7:34 PM, Vincent S Hou <s...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > Dave, > > > > We will release the artifacts for source code only, so there will not be > tagged docker images. It does not matter what we have tagged the existing > images. > > > > > > Best wishes. > > Vincent Hou (侯胜博) > > > > Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM > Cloud > > > > Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com, > > Phone: +1(919)254-7182 > > Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United > States > > > > -----"David P Grove" <gro...@us.ibm.com> wrote: ----- > > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > > From: "David P Grove" <gro...@us.ibm.com> > > Date: 06/20/2018 08:27AM > > Subject: Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk > > > > > > > > "Vincent S Hou" <s...@us.ibm.com> wrote on 06/20/2018 06:47:25 AM: > >> > >> We are currently working on the first release of OpenWhisk. The > >> version name is called incubator-1.0.0, and the subversion is > >> rc2(rc1 as a pilot, has been existing for while). > >> > >> There will be 13 openwhisk projected to be released. > >> The PR in OpenWhisk release repo contains all the information of the > >> hash values of all the repositories: https:// > >> urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url? > >> > > u=https-3A__github.com_apache_incubator-2Dopenwhisk- > 2Drelease_pull_190&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx- > > > >> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV- > >> apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=fyO8VqoMt6Yv9Lv7Yf5eUOQgH74eoKPi_3p_WU- > >> hZEw&s=mONyOT6wjdWl4JJQg685CHlwAU469EtEj_c49PytCnI&e=. The artifacts > >> will be generated, when this PR is merged. > >> > >> If you have any questions or concerns, please chime in with your > > comments. > >> > > > > This is great!! > > > > I had a procedural question, is part of the release process changing the > > various "latest" tags for docker images (openwhisk/invoker, etc) to > > "incubator-1.0.0" in the ansible/yaml files that specify docker images to > > pull, or is that not needed because this is a source only release and > there > > will not be matching docker images? > > > > --dave > > >
