We need to also document a roadmap. -r
> On Jun 20, 2018, at 1:23 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Good question James > > I think we create a check box list for release 1.0.0 in the release repo > and discuss > items on the list would need help from folks to take ownership. > > We can even create github MileStone for each release, and we can create > today the 1.0.0 milestone and add issues to resolve before we can release. > > > -- Carlos > >> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:17 PM James Thomas <jthomas...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> 0.9 makes sense to me. >> >> Something to think about it - what would constitute a 1.0 release? Whilst >> the platform is still evolving rapidly, it has been in production on >> multiple providers for over 12 months. What things would we like to tick >> off before reaching this stage? >> >> On 20 June 2018 at 17:38, Michele Sciabarra <openwh...@sciabarra.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I agree with 0.9.0 >>> >>> -- >>> Michele Sciabarra >>> openwh...@sciabarra.com >>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 6:37 PM, Michele Sciabarra wrote: >>>> I agree with 0.9.0. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Michele Sciabarra >>>> mich...@sciabarra.com >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 6:31 PM, Rob Allen wrote: >>>>> On 20 Jun 2018, at 16:24, Matt Rutkowski <mrutk...@us.ibm.com> >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Can we go with 0.9.0? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 0.9.0 is fine with me. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Rob >>>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> James Thomas >>
