James Check out the docs directory in the release repo for example https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/release_instructions.md
That was the intention from the start to automate everything, and to have instructions for any committer to be a release manager for a module/artifact -cs On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:21 PM James Thomas <jthomas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can we also write up the release process in markdown and store in in the > repo to help future release managers (unless Vincent wants to do it forever > :))? > > On 20 June 2018 at 20:59, Vincent S Hou <s...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Give me the honor to the initiative as the first release manager of > > OpenWhisk. > > The first version is named after "0.9.0-incubating", based on the > semantic > > version 2.0. > > I am preparing the email for VOTE now. I will send out the email by the > > end of today. > > > > > > > > Best wishes. > > Vincent Hou (侯胜博) > > > > Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM > > Cloud > > > > Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com, > > Phone: +1(919)254-7182 <(919)%20254-7182> > > Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United > > States > > > > -----"Matt Rutkowski" <mrutk...@us.ibm.com> wrote: ----- > > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > > From: "Matt Rutkowski" <mrutk...@us.ibm.com> > > Date: 06/20/2018 03:05PM > > Subject: Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk > > > > Agree, Vincent should be first Release Manager. Do we have a champagne > > bottle somewhere? > > > > Kind regards, > > Matt > > > > > > > > From: Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> > > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > > Date: 06/20/2018 01:36 PM > > Subject: Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk > > > > > > > > Vincent, > > > > If it's not already clear :-), I think should do the honors, and be > > release > > manager for the first release :-) > > I'm out most of the month of July (vacation). But will volunteer to do a > > release in August > > > > Thread to dev list for vote should have the following Subject "[VOTE] > > Release Apache OpenWhisk (incubating) version 0.9.0" > > And include the details of the location of the RC, and the instructions > > for > > voting including the deadline of 72 hours. > > > > Release Candidate 1 should be located in > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/0.9.0/RC1/ > > > > It's a requirement that artifacts need to include the string "incubating" > > as part of the version. > > Since we are trying to use semantic versioning "incubating" should be at > > the end. > > > > dev/incubator/openwhisk/0.9.0/RC1/openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz > > dev/incubator/openwhisk/0.9.0/RC1/openwhisk-apigateway-0.9. > > 0-incubating.tar.gz > > dev/incubator/openwhisk/0.9.0/RC1/openwhisk-cli-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz > > ... > > > > We should remove "incubator", and put "incubating" at the end. > > Also I would remove "sources" from the name. Only sources are distributed > > on apache servers. > > After graduation, we stop using "-incubating" > > > > -cs > > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:39 PM Vincent S Hou <s...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > So far, we can formally name the first version incubator-0.9.0 to > > indicate > > > the incubator status as well, and use subversion like rc1, rc2, etc, > > before > > > moving the artifacts to the final release SVN URL. > > > > > > For incubator-0.9.0-rc1, the package of source code openwhisk in the > dev > > > SVN URL is named after > > openwhisk-apigateway-incubator-0.9.0-sources.tar.gz > > > under the folder of apache-openwhisk-incubator-0.9.0-rc1. > > > > > > Shall we include the name "incubator" as part of the version name? Or > it > > > does not sound attractive. > > > > > > > > > Best wishes. > > > Vincent Hou (侯胜博) > > > > > > Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contrib > <https://maps.google.com/?q=OpenWhisk+Contrib&entry=gmail&source=g>utor, > Open Technology, IBM > > > Cloud > > > > > > Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com, > > > Phone: +1(919)254-7182 <(919)%20254-7182> <(919)%20254-7182> > > > Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd > > > < > > https://maps.google.com/?q=4205+S+Miami+Blvd&entry=gmail&source=g > > > > > > (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States > > > > > > -----James Thomas <jthomas...@gmail.com> wrote: ----- > > > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > > > From: James Thomas <jthomas...@gmail.com> > > > Date: 06/20/2018 01:17PM > > > Subject: Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk > > > > > > 0.9 makes sense to me. > > > > > > Something to think about it - what would constitute a 1.0 release? > > Whilst > > > the platform is still evolving rapidly, it has been in production on > > > multiple providers for over 12 months. What things would we like to > tick > > > off before reaching this stage? > > > > > > On 20 June 2018 at 17:38, Michele Sciabarra <openwh...@sciabarra.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I agree with 0.9.0 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Michele Sciabarra > > > > openwh...@sciabarra.com > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 6:37 PM, Michele Sciabarra wrote: > > > > > I agree with 0.9.0. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Michele Sciabarra > > > > > mich...@sciabarra.com > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 6:31 PM, Rob Allen wrote: > > > > > > On 20 Jun 2018, at 16:24, Matt Rutkowski <mrutk...@us.ibm.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we go with 0.9.0? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 0.9.0 is fine with me. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > James Thomas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > James Thomas >
