I’d love to have this on the website. Thanks, Ed!
> On May 6, 2024, at 19:27, Ed Seidl <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > Given the recent confusion on this list concerning Parquet V1 vs V2, I was > wondering if there was any interest in the community to create a feature > matrix that users could consult to see which implementations would work with > features they consider important. My group is compiling our own version of > this for internal purposes, but we would consider cleaning it up and posting > it somewhere (perhaps on the Parquet site?) if there was interest in this. > Since the format evolves slowly, once a first pass is complete, maintaining > the list hopefully won't be burdensome...as implementers add features, they > could submit PRs for their column in the matrix. > > Thoughts? Or does such a thing exist already somewhere? > > Thanks, > Ed
