Hi, There was an effort on this: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/34
It would be good if we can have something like what Apache Arrow does: - https://arrow.apache.org/docs/status.html - https://arrow.apache.org/docs/cpp/parquet.html#supported-parquet-features But I do have concern that it will be quickly out of date if it covers many projects. Best, Gang On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 4:05 AM Prem Sahoo <prem.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 on this > Sent from my iPhone > > > On May 6, 2024, at 2:27 PM, Vinoo Ganesh <vinoo.gan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I’d love to have this on the website. Thanks, Ed! > > > >> On May 6, 2024, at 19:27, Ed Seidl <etse...@live.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> Given the recent confusion on this list concerning Parquet V1 vs V2, I > was wondering if there was any interest in the community to create a > feature matrix that users could consult to see which implementations would > work with features they consider important. My group is compiling our own > version of this for internal purposes, but we would consider cleaning it up > and posting it somewhere (perhaps on the Parquet site?) if there was > interest in this. Since the format evolves slowly, once a first pass is > complete, maintaining the list hopefully won't be burdensome...as > implementers add features, they could submit PRs for their column in the > matrix. > >> > >> Thoughts? Or does such a thing exist already somewhere? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ed >
