+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 9:55 AM Matt Topol <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025, 10:53 AM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Best, > > Gang > > > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:49 PM Micah Kornfield <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Just wanted to bump this vote thread. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Micah > > > > > > On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current > > > > versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/ > > > > parquet-format/pull/535 > > > > > > > > The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there > have > > > > been several reviewers on the PR. > > > > > > > > A TL;DR; > > > > 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the > version > > > > field in the parquet footer. > > > > 2. Encodings can be used with any page type. > > > > 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not > > > > necessarily recommended as a default. > > > > > > > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > Votes: > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Accept the changes > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ... > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Micah > > > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2 > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535 > > > > > > > > > >
