+1

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 5:08 PM Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thank you Micah for driving this
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 1:44 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 18, 2025, at 9:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > +1 (binding).
> > >
> > > (sorry for overlooking this!)
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Antoine.
> > >
> > >
> > >> Le 18/12/2025 à 16:48, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
> > >> Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Micah
> > >>> On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> > >>> I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
> > >>> versioning  as documented in https://github.com/apache/
> > >>> parquet-format/pull/535
> > >>>
> > >>> The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there
> have
> > >>> been several reviewers on the PR.
> > >>>
> > >>> A TL;DR;
> > >>> 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the
> version
> > >>> field in the parquet footer.
> > >>> 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
> > >>> 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not
> > >>> necessarily recommended as a default.
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>>
> > >>> Votes:
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 Accept the changes
> > >>> [ ] +0
> > >>> [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Micah
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
> > >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to