Here is a PR that turns Prateek's document into markdown in the parquet-format repo - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/548
I am a little worried we will have two set of parallel comments (one in the google doc and one in the PR) However, the spec is of sufficient quality (thanks, again Prateek) that it would be possible for another language implementation to be attempted. Andrew On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 8:54 AM Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> wrote: > I plan to help turn the document into a PR to parquet-format later today > > And again thank you Prateek and everyone for helping make this happen > > Andrew > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 6:34 AM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Yes, I'd really rather comment on the final spec, rather than a Google >> doc. >> >> (also, Google Doc comments are not terrific for non-trivial discussions) >> >> >> Le 14/01/2026 à 10:37, Gang Wu a écrit : >> > Is it better to create a PR against >> https://github.com/apache/parquet-format >> > so >> > it can become the single source of truth of the Parquet-ALP spec? >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 9:34 AM Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Thank you Micah for the detailed review! >> >> Who else needs to do a round of reviews on the spec before we can >> finalize >> >> it? >> >> >>
