Now only Maruans issue is open. I'm currently fixing more javadoc stuff
for 1.8 and 2.0 and will comment when done. This will be finished in 15 min.
After that, two possibilities IMO:
- if you can also work on it tomorrow, just wait for Maruan
- if you can only work on it today, then set the issue to resolved after
I'm done and Maruan can open a new issue.
Tilman
Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
Hi,
Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
Hi,
it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
Yes!
WDYT?
Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the
trunk
which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4
open issues
[1] marked with fix for 1.8.5?
PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>:
person didn't
answer => set to resolve
+1
PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW
bug has
been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really
know what to
do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e. that would
1. include
the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and
non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title
to the bug
only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT?
Sounds reasonable. Will you do that?
PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO
the bug has
been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve.
+1
PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll
let Maruan
resolve that one
Tilman
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
[1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
Thanks for the fast reply
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
