I submitted a patch in January to PDFBOX-399<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-399> for ignoring badly-formatted CMap ToUnicode instructions. Can this be considered for inclusion in 1.8 series?
Apologies if I put the patch in the wrong issue. Cheng On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:40 AM, John Hewson <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks good to me! > > -- John > > > On 18 Apr 2014, at 14:52, Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > >> Hi, > >> > >> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes > > > > Yes! > > > >> WDYT? > >> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the > trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 > open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? > > > > PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>: person > didn't answer => set to resolve > > PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW > bug has been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really > know what to do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e. > that would 1. include the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, > deterministic and non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change > the title to the bug only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 > only. WDYT? > > PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO the > bug has been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve. > > PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll > let Maruan resolve that one > > > > Tilman > > > >> > >> BR > >> Andreas Lehmkühler > >> > >> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ > > >
