Looks good to me! -- John
> On 18 Apr 2014, at 14:52, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> wrote: > > Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >> Hi, >> >> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes > > Yes! > >> WDYT? >> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk >> which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open >> issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? > > PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>: person > didn't answer => set to resolve > PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW bug has > been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what > to do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e. that would 1. > include the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and > non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the > bug only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT? > PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO the bug > has been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve. > PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll let > Maruan resolve that one > > Tilman > >> >> BR >> Andreas Lehmkühler >> >> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ >
