Hi,
Am 18.04.2014 16:58, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
Now only Maruans issue is open. I'm currently fixing more javadoc stuff for 1.8
and 2.0 and will comment when done. This will be finished in 15 min.
After that, two possibilities IMO:
- if you can also work on it tomorrow, just wait for Maruan
- if you can only work on it today, then set the issue to resolved after I'm
done and Maruan can open a new issue.
IMHO we are not in a hurry here, so let's wait a couple of days to give the
other committers a chance to provide their opinion about the new release.
Tilman
Thanks so far for handling those open issues.
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
Hi,
Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
Hi,
it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
Yes!
WDYT?
Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk
which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues
[1] marked with fix for 1.8.5?
PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>: person didn't
answer => set to resolve
+1
PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW bug has
been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what to
do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e. that would 1. include
the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and
non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the bug
only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT?
Sounds reasonable. Will you do that?
PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO the bug has
been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve.
+1
PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll let Maruan
resolve that one
Tilman
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
[1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
Thanks for the fast reply
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
