Hi, > Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> hat am 16. September 2014 um 18:03 > geschrieben: > > > -1, I don't like the idea to have different repository types. Hmmm, is this just a "I don't like it, but I can live with it" or is it a clear veto?
In a case of a veto, how about starting with moving parts of the docs to a new git repo? IMO sooner or later the project will move from svn to git and that would be a good opertunity to get used to the general usage of git and of course to the special processes used here at the ASF so that we are not thrown in at the deep end after the migration. > Tilman BR Andreas > > Am 16.09.2014 um 10:21 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > Hi there, > > > > in order to make it easier for people to contribute to the documentation and > > examples I thought about the potential benefits of moving these to a git > > based repository instead of svn. The main idea behind that is to allow > > people to contribute via github opening another channel of communication and > > making it easier to contribute. > > > > Proposed names are pdfbox-docs and pdfbox-examples. Take a look at > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs for an example of that. > > > > I haven’t thought about all potential implications and changes necessary yet > > but wanted to get a first feedback about support for that idea before > > putting more effort into that. > > > > WDYT? > > > > Maruan >
