is that because of the examples, the docs or both? BR
Maruan Am 17.09.2014 um 18:46 schrieb Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de>: > It is a "I don't like it, but I can live with it but I think it might be a > pain". A "soft -1". > > Tilman > > Am 17.09.2014 um 08:40 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: >> Hi, >> >>> Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> hat am 16. September 2014 um 18:03 >>> geschrieben: >>> >>> >>> -1, I don't like the idea to have different repository types. >> Hmmm, is this just a "I don't like it, but I can live with it" or is it a >> clear >> veto? >> >> In a case of a veto, how about starting with moving parts of the docs to a >> new >> git repo? IMO sooner or later the project will move from svn to git and that >> would be a good opertunity to get used to the general usage of git and of >> course >> to the special processes used here at the ASF so that we are not thrown in at >> the deep end after the migration. >> >>> Tilman >> BR >> Andreas >> >>> Am 16.09.2014 um 10:21 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >>>> Hi there, >>>> >>>> in order to make it easier for people to contribute to the documentation >>>> and >>>> examples I thought about the potential benefits of moving these to a git >>>> based repository instead of svn. The main idea behind that is to allow >>>> people to contribute via github opening another channel of communication >>>> and >>>> making it easier to contribute. >>>> >>>> Proposed names are pdfbox-docs and pdfbox-examples. Take a look at >>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs for an example of that. >>>> >>>> I haven’t thought about all potential implications and changes necessary >>>> yet >>>> but wanted to get a first feedback about support for that idea before >>>> putting more effort into that. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> Maruan >
