I’d think if projects such as Apache Camel, Apache Jackrabbit, Apache Tomee, Apache Cordova to mention some can handle it we should be smart enough to handle it too. And I can’t see the issues tab for these projects but pull requests.
BR Maruan Am 20.09.2014 um 04:22 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: >> Issue tracking would still be done using Jira. Same as for most other Apache >> projects > > The problem with that approach is that GitHub’s pull requests can only be > managed via GitHub’s issues interface, so we’re forced to use it. There’s no > way to prevent GitHub users from opening and discussing issues in pull > requests rather than on JIRA. > > -- John > > On 17 Sep 2014, at 21:58, Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> wrote: > >> >> >> Maruan Sahyoun >> >>> Am 18.09.2014 um 02:03 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: >>> >>> I agree with Tilman on this point, the examples need to stay in the trunk >>> where they can be built along with it. >>> It’s very common to modify an example to take into account API changes. >>> They’re also currently distributed along with the main PDFBox source >>> bundle, which is a good thing. >>> >>> I’d be surprised if anybody outside of the project wanted to contribute to >>> the documentation, almost nobody seems to like writing it. Perhaps we could >>> do this as a trial - see if it really increases contributions or not? It >>> would be great if it did. >>> >> >> OK so lets try with the docs. >> >> To mention it for completness - the build process for the web site and the >> documentation contained within will still be done by the Apache CMS. >> >>> It’s worth adding that I’m (reluctantly) against moving PDFBox trunk over >>> to GitHub because GitHub Issues is not powerful enough for our needs (e.g. >>> no file attachments), which is really a shame. >>> >> >> Issue tracking would still be done using Jira. Same as for most other Apache >> projects >> >>> -- John >>> >>>> On 17 Sep 2014, at 10:26, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Maruan, >>>> >>>> The examples only. >>>> >>>> With "the docs" I assume you mean the website. I've never touched it >>>> (although I might in the future), it isn't part of the project, so I don't >>>> mind. >>>> >>>> Tilman >>>> >>>>> Am 17.09.2014 um 19:01 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >>>>> is that because of the examples, the docs or both? >>>>> >>>>> BR >>>>> >>>>> Maruan >>>>> >>>>>> Am 17.09.2014 um 18:46 schrieb Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de>: >>>>>> >>>>>> It is a "I don't like it, but I can live with it but I think it might be >>>>>> a pain". A "soft -1". >>>>>> >>>>>> Tilman >>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 17.09.2014 um 08:40 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> hat am 16. September 2014 um >>>>>>>> 18:03 >>>>>>>> geschrieben: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -1, I don't like the idea to have different repository types. >>>>>>> Hmmm, is this just a "I don't like it, but I can live with it" or is it >>>>>>> a clear >>>>>>> veto? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In a case of a veto, how about starting with moving parts of the docs >>>>>>> to a new >>>>>>> git repo? IMO sooner or later the project will move from svn to git and >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> would be a good opertunity to get used to the general usage of git and >>>>>>> of course >>>>>>> to the special processes used here at the ASF so that we are not thrown >>>>>>> in at >>>>>>> the deep end after the migration. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tilman >>>>>>> BR >>>>>>> Andreas >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am 16.09.2014 um 10:21 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >>>>>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> in order to make it easier for people to contribute to the >>>>>>>>> documentation and >>>>>>>>> examples I thought about the potential benefits of moving these to a >>>>>>>>> git >>>>>>>>> based repository instead of svn. The main idea behind that is to allow >>>>>>>>> people to contribute via github opening another channel of >>>>>>>>> communication and >>>>>>>>> making it easier to contribute. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Proposed names are pdfbox-docs and pdfbox-examples. Take a look at >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs for an example of that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I haven’t thought about all potential implications and changes >>>>>>>>> necessary yet >>>>>>>>> but wanted to get a first feedback about support for that idea before >>>>>>>>> putting more effort into that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maruan >>> >
