Something to consider for mod_perl 2.0. Even though it'll create a dependency
on Module::Build. Any takers?
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: MakeMaker Is DOOMED!
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 01:30:56 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tonite at Portland.pm I gave a lightning talk entitled "MakeMaker Is DOOMED!
or MakeMaker Is Dead! Long Live Module::Build!".
Executive summary:
The architecture of MakeMaker is fundamentally flawed by having to use
an external build tool. Further feature development is discouraged.
Use Module::Build instead.
Which is what I've been saying all long. :)
http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/talks/MakeMaker_Is_DOOMED/
I'll be giving a somewhat longer version of this at the German Perl Workshop,
pending some financial disputes, talking a lot more about Module::Build and
less about how much I am sick of MakeMaker.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [Fwd: MakeMaker Is DOOMED!] Stas Bekman
- Re: [Fwd: MakeMaker Is DOOMED!] Philip M. Gollucci
- Re: [Fwd: MakeMaker Is DOOMED!] Stas Bekman
- Re: [Fwd: MakeMaker Is DOOMED!] Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: [Fwd: MakeMaker Is DOOMED!] Stas Bekman
- Re: [Fwd: MakeMaker Is DOOMED!] Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [Fwd: MakeMaker Is DOOMED!] Stas Bekman
- Re: [Fwd: MakeMaker Is DOOMED!] A . Bergman
- Re: [Fwd: MakeMaker Is DOOMED!] Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: [Fwd: MakeMaker Is DOOMED!] Stas Bekman
