I think I might be interested in this. Especially since I haven't seen any posts about it yet.
Any pointers on where to start ? I'll get back with more info later this weekend (aka not valentines day) On Thursday 13 February 2003 22:59, Stas Bekman wrote: > Something to consider for mod_perl 2.0. Even though it'll create a > dependency on Module::Build. Any takers? > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: MakeMaker Is DOOMED! > Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 01:30:56 -0800 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Tonite at Portland.pm I gave a lightning talk entitled "MakeMaker Is > DOOMED! or MakeMaker Is Dead! Long Live Module::Build!". > > Executive summary: > The architecture of MakeMaker is fundamentally flawed by having to use > an external build tool. Further feature development is discouraged. > Use Module::Build instead. > > Which is what I've been saying all long. :) > > http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/talks/MakeMaker_Is_DOOMED/ > > I'll be giving a somewhat longer version of this at the German Perl > Workshop, pending some financial disputes, talking a lot more about > Module::Build and less about how much I am sick of MakeMaker. -- END ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] 301.474.9294 301.646.3011 (cell) Science, Discovery, & the Universe (UMCP) Webmaster & Webship Teacher URL: http://www.sdu.umd.edu eJournalPress Database/PERL Programmer & System Admin URL : http://www.ejournalpress.com Resume : http://p6m7g8.net/Resume --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
