Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, A. Bergman wrote:
httpd requires make. I don't see much point in adding a requirement
when we can't remove the requirement of make anyway.
Well, one can get precompiled httpd for win32.
That's a good point. If Module::Build makes it easier to build
mod_perl on Win32 then I'm all for it.
According to Ken, he didn't have any bug reports, though he said that it's
just possible that it wasn't tested enough ;)
Otherwise then I still think time could be spent better. :-)
In the short run, yes. In the long run, not so sure.
Stas, when do you need to subclass the MM stuff for mod_perl?
Maybe there is something in that I am missing too.
At least on two occasions. When I was trying to glue the pods to .pm
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl-dev&m=104411330329305&w=2
and when I was trying to make ModPerl::MM useful for thirdparty modules:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=104405853500001&r=1&w=2
and
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=104396789100001&r=1&w=2
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
