[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15233052#comment-15233052
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2535:
-----------------------------------------
Github user enis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/159#discussion_r59096272
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -27,9 +27,11 @@
<module>phoenix-flume</module>
<module>phoenix-pig</module>
<module>phoenix-server-client</module>
- <module>phoenix-server</module>
--- End diff --
I like the phoenix-queryserver and phoenix-queryserver-client as names of
the modules. phoenix-server-client is hard to parse without knowing
phoenix-server is phoenix query server.
> Create shaded clients (thin + thick)
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-2535
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Sergey Soldatov
> Fix For: 4.8.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-2535-1.patch, PHOENIX-2535-2.patch,
> PHOENIX-2535-3.patch, PHOENIX-2535-4.patch, PHOENIX-2535-5.patch
>
>
> Having shaded client artifacts helps greatly in minimizing the dependency
> conflicts at the run time. We are seeing more of Phoenix JDBC client being
> used in Storm topologies and other settings where guava versions become a
> problem.
> I think we can do a parallel artifact for the thick client with shaded
> dependencies and also using shaded hbase. For thin client, maybe shading
> should be the default since it is new?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
