I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there anything missing? Thanks, James
On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <ankitsingha...@gmail.com> wrote: > PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch. > After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to check whether > the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has uncovered some old > bugs. > PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, will upload > patch soon. > > Regards, > Ankit Singhal > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone working on > > it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045? > > > > Are these the only two? > > > > Thanks, > > James > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <tdsi...@salesforce.com > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on patch and > I > > > should be able to get it committed soon. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Thomas > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal < > ankitsingha...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me > bring > > > the > > > > RC soon. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Ankit Singhal > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshb...@apache.org > <javascript:;> < > > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have committed the upgrade related blockers. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Rajeshbabu. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan < > > > mcho...@salesforce.com <javascript:;>> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker for > > them > > > > but > > > > > > good to have if a fix is easy. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <la...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose track > of > > > it. > > > > If > > > > > > > it's not an issue we can move to 4.9. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > *From:* James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" < > dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba > > > > > Chohan > > > > > > < > > > > > > > mcho...@salesforce.com <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would it > be > > > > > > possible > > > > > > > to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being targeted > > for > > > > > > > 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056 > > > > > > > a blocker? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this > broke > > > PQS > > > > > > > > somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the > > > > o.a.phoenix.shaded > > > > > > > > package). Might just be something to fix at build time > > > (hopefully, > > > > > > > anyways) > > > > > > > > -- I'm looking at it now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rajeshb...@apache.org <javascript:;> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on > > it. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important > to > > > get > > > > > it. > > > > > > > >>> -- Lars > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsingha...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > >>> To: James Taylor<jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > >>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>"< > dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; > > Samarth > > > > > Jain< > > > > > > > >>> samarth.j...@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>; Rajeshbabu > Chintaguntla< > > > > > > > >>> rchintagun...@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas > D'Silva< > > > > > > tdsi...@salesforce.com <javascript:;> > > > > > > > >; > > > > > > > >>> Mujtaba Chohan<mcho...@salesforce.com <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > >>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM > > > > > > > >>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC? > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready > with > > > > > review > > > > > > > >>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with > cascade) > > on > > > > > > > cluster. > > > > > > > >>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local > > > index > > > > > > > upgrade > > > > > > > >>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest > patch > > > on > > > > > > > >>> PHOENIX-3002. > > > > > > > >>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh > are > > > in > > > > > > > transit > > > > > > > >>> for 2 days. > > > > > > > >>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Regards, > > > > > > > >>> Ankit Singhal > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor< > > > > > jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> How we looking for the RC? > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain< > > samarth.j...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have > > > > checked > > > > > > in. > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > >>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if > > needed. > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are: > > > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902 > > > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29 > > > > > > > >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99 > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in. > > > > > > > >>>>>> -- Lars > > > > > > > >>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sama...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM > > > > > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC? > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. > > > Will > > > > > work > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> this > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix > > config > > > > or > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> something > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> more. > > > > > > > >>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get > > > > > > PHOENIX-3035 > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> in. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor< > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to > > > update > > > > > > this > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> daily > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could > > commit > > > > > there > > > > > > > >>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for > > you), > > > > > that > > > > > > be > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> much > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> appreciated. > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > >>>>>>> James > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
