Yes, it is already committed.. I'll try to get the RC today. On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:43 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok - would it be possible to get an RC up today once PHOENIX-3021 is > checked in? > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Ankit Singhal <ankitsingha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > As per description, PHOENIX-3021 seems to be a serious issue with local > > index. As the fix is almost there, we can wait for it, if others agree > on > > same. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Builds look good now. Should Sergey commit PHOENIX-3021? Or should we > >> proceed with RC without it? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> James > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:08 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > No problem, Tongzhou. I think your change uncovered some existing > >> issues, > >> > mainly environmental issues at test-time in shutting down the > IndexTool. > >> > Hopefully we're good to go now. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > James > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Simon Wang < > >> > simon.w...@airbnb.com.invalid> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Thanks, James! > >> >> I thought PHOENIX-3061 would be a simple change, but it became much > >> more > >> >> complex than I imagined. Thank you, Thomas, Mujtaba, and Ankit for > >> jumping > >> >> in and helping fixing the issues. I will keep studying Phoenix > >> codebase, > >> >> and look to make more contributions in future! > >> >> > >> >> Best, > >> >> Tongzhou (Simon) > >> >> > >> >> > On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:48 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org > > > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > Ok, fix checked in. If we get a clean build, let's move ahead with > >> the > >> >> RC > >> >> > unless anyone knows of any other blockers. > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > James > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:17 AM, James Taylor < > >> jamestay...@apache.org> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at it now. Stay tuned. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ankit Singhal < > >> >> ankitsingha...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >>> Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061. > >> >> >>> @Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor < > >> >> jamestay...@apache.org> > >> >> >>> wrote: > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there anything > >> >> missing? > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> Thanks, > >> >> >>>> James > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal < > >> ankitsingha...@gmail.com> > >> >> >>> wrote: > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch. > >> >> >>>>> After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to > >> check > >> >> >>>> whether > >> >> >>>>> the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has > uncovered > >> >> some > >> >> >>>> old > >> >> >>>>> bugs. > >> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, > will > >> >> >>> upload > >> >> >>>>> patch soon. > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> Regards, > >> >> >>>>> Ankit Singhal > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor < > >> >> jamestay...@apache.org > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone > >> >> >>> working > >> >> >>>> on > >> >> >>>>>> it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045? > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> Are these the only two? > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> Thanks, > >> >> >>>>>> James > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva < > >> >> >>>> tdsi...@salesforce.com > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on > >> patch > >> >> >>>> and > >> >> >>>>> I > >> >> >>>>>>> should be able to get it committed soon. > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >> >>>>>>> Thomas > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal < > >> >> >>>>> ankitsingha...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. > Let > >> me > >> >> >>>>> bring > >> >> >>>>>>> the > >> >> >>>>>>>> RC soon. > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> Regards, > >> >> >>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshb...@apache.org > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;> < > >> >> >>>>>>>> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have committed the upgrade related blockers. > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Rajeshbabu. > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan < > >> >> >>>>>>> mcho...@salesforce.com <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 > blocker > >> >> >>> for > >> >> >>>>>> them > >> >> >>>>>>>> but > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> good to have if a fix is easy. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <la...@apache.org > >> >> >>>> <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose > >> >> >>> track > >> >> >>>>> of > >> >> >>>>>>> it. > >> >> >>>>>>>> If > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> it's not an issue we can move to 4.9. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *From:* James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org > >> >> >>> <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" < > >> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Chohan > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> < > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> mcho...@salesforce.com <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC? > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? > >> >> >>> Would > >> >> >>>> it > >> >> >>>>> be > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> possible > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being > >> >> >>>> targeted > >> >> >>>>>> for > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056 > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> a blocker? > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> James > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser < > >> >> >>>> els...@apache.org > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like > >> >> >>> this > >> >> >>>>> broke > >> >> >>>>>>> PQS > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the > >> >> >>>>>>>> o.a.phoenix.shaded > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> package). Might just be something to fix at build time > >> >> >>>>>>> (hopefully, > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> anyways) > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- I'm looking at it now. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> rajeshb...@apache.org <javascript:;> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. > >> >> >>> Working > >> >> >>>> on > >> >> >>>>>> it. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems > >> >> >>>> important > >> >> >>>>> to > >> >> >>>>>>> get > >> >> >>>>>>>>> it. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsingha...@gmail.com > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: James Taylor<jamestay...@apache.org > >> >> >>> <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>"< > >> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; > >> >> >>>>>> Samarth > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Jain< > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> samarth.j...@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>; > >> >> >>> Rajeshbabu > >> >> >>>>> Chintaguntla< > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rchintagun...@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas > >> >> >>>>> D'Silva< > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> tdsi...@salesforce.com <javascript:;> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mcho...@salesforce.com <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC? > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are > >> >> >>> ready > >> >> >>>>> with > >> >> >>>>>>>>> review > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with > >> >> >>>>> cascade) > >> >> >>>>>> on > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> cluster. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for > >> >> >>>> local > >> >> >>>>>>> index > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> upgrade > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with > >> >> >>> latest > >> >> >>>>> patch > >> >> >>>>>>> on > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3002. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and > >> >> >>> Rajesh > >> >> >>>>> are > >> >> >>>>>>> in > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> transit > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 2 days. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor< > >> >> >>>>>>>>> jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for the RC? > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain< > >> >> >>>>>> samarth.j...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I > >> >> >>>> have > >> >> >>>>>>>> checked > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> in. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if > >> >> >>>>>> needed. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902 > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29 > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902 > >> >> >>>> 99 > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sama...@apache.org > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC? > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of > >> >> >>>> now. > >> >> >>>>>>> Will > >> >> >>>>>>>>> work > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> on > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning > >> >> >>> phoenix > >> >> >>>>>> config > >> >> >>>>>>>> or > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically > >> >> >>> get > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3035 > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor< > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be > >> >> >>> possible > >> >> >>>> to > >> >> >>>>>>> update > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> this > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daily > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks > >> >> >>> could > >> >> >>>>>> commit > >> >> >>>>>>>>> there > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it > >> >> >>> for > >> >> >>>>>> you), > >> >> >>>>>>>>> that > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> be > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > > >
