If you don't have time today, Ankit (as its getting late in India) perhaps Mujtaba may be able to cut the RCs this morning US time?
On Wednesday, July 13, 2016, Ankit Singhal <ankitsingha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, it is already committed.. I'll try to get the RC today. > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:43 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > Ok - would it be possible to get an RC up today once PHOENIX-3021 is > > checked in? > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Ankit Singhal <ankitsingha...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > As per description, PHOENIX-3021 seems to be a serious issue with local > > > index. As the fix is almost there, we can wait for it, if others agree > > on > > > same. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Builds look good now. Should Sergey commit PHOENIX-3021? Or should we > > >> proceed with RC without it? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> James > > >> > > >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:08 AM, James Taylor < > jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > No problem, Tongzhou. I think your change uncovered some existing > > >> issues, > > >> > mainly environmental issues at test-time in shutting down the > > IndexTool. > > >> > Hopefully we're good to go now. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > James > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Simon Wang < > > >> > simon.w...@airbnb.com.invalid> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Thanks, James! > > >> >> I thought PHOENIX-3061 would be a simple change, but it became much > > >> more > > >> >> complex than I imagined. Thank you, Thomas, Mujtaba, and Ankit for > > >> jumping > > >> >> in and helping fixing the issues. I will keep studying Phoenix > > >> codebase, > > >> >> and look to make more contributions in future! > > >> >> > > >> >> Best, > > >> >> Tongzhou (Simon) > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:48 AM, James Taylor < > jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;> > > > > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Ok, fix checked in. If we get a clean build, let's move ahead > with > > >> the > > >> >> RC > > >> >> > unless anyone knows of any other blockers. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Thanks, > > >> >> > James > > >> >> > > > >> >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:17 AM, James Taylor < > > >> jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > >> >> > wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at it now. Stay tuned. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ankit Singhal < > > >> >> ankitsingha...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >> wrote: > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >>> Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061. > > >> >> >>> @Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same. > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor < > > >> >> jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>> wrote: > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>>> I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there > anything > > >> >> missing? > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> Thanks, > > >> >> >>>> James > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal < > > >> ankitsingha...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch. > > >> >> >>>>> After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to > > >> check > > >> >> >>>> whether > > >> >> >>>>> the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has > > uncovered > > >> >> some > > >> >> >>>> old > > >> >> >>>>> bugs. > > >> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, > > will > > >> >> >>> upload > > >> >> >>>>> patch soon. > > >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>> Regards, > > >> >> >>>>> Ankit Singhal > > >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor < > > >> >> jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is > someone > > >> >> >>> working > > >> >> >>>> on > > >> >> >>>>>> it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045? > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> Are these the only two? > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >> >>>>>> James > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva < > > >> >> >>>> tdsi...@salesforce.com <javascript:;> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>> We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working > on > > >> patch > > >> >> >>>> and > > >> >> >>>>> I > > >> >> >>>>>>> should be able to get it committed soon. > > >> >> >>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >> >>>>>>> Thomas > > >> >> >>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal < > > >> >> >>>>> ankitsingha...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> > > >> >> >>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. > > Let > > >> me > > >> >> >>>>> bring > > >> >> >>>>>>> the > > >> >> >>>>>>>> RC soon. > > >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> Regards, > > >> >> >>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal > > >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshb...@apache.org > <javascript:;> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;> < > > >> >> >>>>>>>> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have committed the upgrade related blockers. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Rajeshbabu. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan < > > >> >> >>>>>>> mcho...@salesforce.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 > > blocker > > >> >> >>> for > > >> >> >>>>>> them > > >> >> >>>>>>>> but > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> good to have if a fix is easy. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <la...@apache.org > <javascript:;> > > >> >> >>>> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose > > >> >> >>> track > > >> >> >>>>> of > > >> >> >>>>>>> it. > > >> >> >>>>>>>> If > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> it's not an issue we can move to 4.9. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *From:* James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org > <javascript:;> > > >> >> >>> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>" < > > >> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>; > Mujtaba > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Chohan > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> < > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> mcho...@salesforce.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC? > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? > > >> >> >>> Would > > >> >> >>>> it > > >> >> >>>>> be > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> possible > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being > > >> >> >>>> targeted > > >> >> >>>>>> for > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056 > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> a blocker? > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> James > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser < > > >> >> >>>> els...@apache.org <javascript:;> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like > > >> >> >>> this > > >> >> >>>>> broke > > >> >> >>>>>>> PQS > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the > > >> >> >>>>>>>> o.a.phoenix.shaded > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> package). Might just be something to fix at build time > > >> >> >>>>>>> (hopefully, > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> anyways) > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- I'm looking at it now. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> rajeshb...@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;> > wrote: > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. > > >> >> >>> Working > > >> >> >>>> on > > >> >> >>>>>> it. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org > <javascript:;> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems > > >> >> >>>> important > > >> >> >>>>> to > > >> >> >>>>>>> get > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> it. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsingha...@gmail.com > <javascript:;> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: James Taylor<jamestay...@apache.org > <javascript:;> > > >> >> >>> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>"< > > >> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>; > > >> >> >>>>>> Samarth > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Jain< > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> samarth.j...@salesforce.com <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>>; > > >> >> >>> Rajeshbabu > > >> >> >>>>> Chintaguntla< > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rchintagun...@hortonworks.com <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>>; Thomas > > >> >> >>>>> D'Silva< > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> tdsi...@salesforce.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mcho...@salesforce.com > <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC? > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are > > >> >> >>> ready > > >> >> >>>>> with > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> review > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with > > >> >> >>>>> cascade) > > >> >> >>>>>> on > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> cluster. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for > > >> >> >>>> local > > >> >> >>>>>>> index > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> upgrade > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with > > >> >> >>> latest > > >> >> >>>>> patch > > >> >> >>>>>>> on > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3002. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and > > >> >> >>> Rajesh > > >> >> >>>>> are > > >> >> >>>>>>> in > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> transit > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 2 days. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor< > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for the RC? > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain< > > >> >> >>>>>> samarth.j...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that > I > > >> >> >>>> have > > >> >> >>>>>>>> checked > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> in. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, > if > > >> >> >>>>>> needed. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of > are: > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902 > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29 > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902 > > >> >> >>>> 99 > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org > <javascript:;> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get > in. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sama...@apache.org > <javascript:;> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org > <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC? > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as > of > > >> >> >>>> now. > > >> >> >>>>>>> Will > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> work > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> on > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning > > >> >> >>> phoenix > > >> >> >>>>>> config > > >> >> >>>>>>>> or > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to > opportunistically > > >> >> >>> get > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3035 > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor< > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be > > >> >> >>> possible > > >> >> >>>> to > > >> >> >>>>>>> update > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> this > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daily > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks > > >> >> >>> could > > >> >> >>>>>> commit > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> there > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do > it > > >> >> >>> for > > >> >> >>>>>> you), > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> that > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> be > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
