Thanks, James! 
I thought PHOENIX-3061 would be a simple change, but it became much more 
complex than I imagined. Thank you, Thomas, Mujtaba, and Ankit for jumping in 
and helping fixing the issues. I will keep studying Phoenix codebase, and look 
to make more contributions in future!

Best,
Tongzhou (Simon)

> On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:48 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Ok, fix checked in. If we get a clean build, let's move ahead with the RC
> unless anyone knows of any other blockers.
> 
> Thanks,
> James
> 
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:17 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at it now. Stay tuned.
>> 
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ankit Singhal <ankitsingha...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061.
>>> @Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there anything missing?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> James
>>>> 
>>>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <ankitsingha...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
>>>>> After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to check
>>>> whether
>>>>> the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has uncovered some
>>>> old
>>>>> bugs.
>>>>> PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, will
>>> upload
>>>>> patch soon.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Ankit Singhal
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone
>>> working
>>>> on
>>>>>> it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Are these the only two?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> James
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <
>>>> tdsi...@salesforce.com
>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on patch
>>>> and
>>>>> I
>>>>>>> should be able to get it committed soon.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <
>>>>> ankitsingha...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks Rajesh.  As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me
>>>>> bring
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> RC soon.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshb...@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:;> <
>>>>>>>> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Rajeshbabu.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
>>>>>>> mcho...@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker
>>> for
>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>> good to have if a fix is easy.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <la...@apache.org
>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose
>>> track
>>>>> of
>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>> If
>>>>>>>>>>> it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org
>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <
>>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba
>>>>>>>>> Chohan
>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>> mcho...@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release?
>>> Would
>>>> it
>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>>>>>> to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being
>>>> targeted
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
>>>>>>>>>>> a blocker?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <
>>>> els...@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like
>>> this
>>>>> broke
>>>>>>> PQS
>>>>>>>>>>>> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
>>>>>>>> o.a.phoenix.shaded
>>>>>>>>>>>> package). Might just be something to fix at build time
>>>>>>> (hopefully,
>>>>>>>>>>> anyways)
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- I'm looking at it now.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> rajeshb...@apache.org <javascript:;> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release.
>>> Working
>>>> on
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:;>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems
>>>> important
>>>>> to
>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsingha...@gmail.com
>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: James Taylor<jamestay...@apache.org
>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>"<
>>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>;
>>>>>> Samarth
>>>>>>>>> Jain<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> samarth.j...@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>;
>>> Rajeshbabu
>>>>> Chintaguntla<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rchintagun...@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
>>>>> D'Silva<
>>>>>>>>>> tdsi...@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mcho...@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are
>>> ready
>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> review
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with
>>>>> cascade)
>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> cluster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for
>>>> local
>>>>>>> index
>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with
>>> latest
>>>>> patch
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3002.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and
>>> Rajesh
>>>>> are
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> transit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 2 days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
>>>>>>>>> jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for the RC?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
>>>>>> samarth.j...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I
>>>> have
>>>>>>>> checked
>>>>>>>>>> in.
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if
>>>>>> needed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>>>> 99
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:;>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     From: Samarth Jain<sama...@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of
>>>> now.
>>>>>>> Will
>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning
>>> phoenix
>>>>>> config
>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically
>>> get
>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3035
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be
>>> possible
>>>> to
>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daily
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks
>>> could
>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it
>>> for
>>>>>> you),
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to