I believe we have critical mass so the meeting is on! If you have not responded yet but planning to attend, please, let me know.
Thanks, Olga -----Original Message----- From: Julien Le Dem [mailto:led...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:21 PM To: dev@pig.apache.org Subject: Re: Pig developer meeting in February Me too. Julien On 1/27/11 4:09 PM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy" <dvrya...@gmail.com> wrote: Ok yeah I'll come :). On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > While there is a lively discussion on this thread, I have not actually > gotten any responses to having the meeting with exception of 1 person :). > > Please, let me know by the end of the week if you are planning to attend. > If we don't get at least a few more responses I suggest we postpone the > meeting. > > Thanks, > > Olga > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:dvrya...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 6:04 PM > To: dev@pig.apache.org > Subject: Re: Pig developer meeting in February > > Right, we do partition filtering, but not true predicate pushdown. > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Daniel Dai <jiany...@yahoo-inc.com> > wrote: > > > Are you talking about LoadMetadata.setPartitionFilter? > > PartitionFilterOptimizer will do that. > > > > Daniel > > > > > > Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote: > > > >> I may be wrong but I think predicate pushdown is designed for, but not > >> actually implemented in the current LoadPushdown interface (you can only > >> push projections). If I am wrong, that's great.. but if not, that would > be > >> an important feature to add, as people are trying to connect Pig to > >> "smart" > >> storage systems like rdbmses, HBase, and Cassandra more and more. I > think > >> we only kind of simulate this with partition keys info, which is not > >> always > >> sufficient > >> > >> D > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Julien Le Dem <led...@yahoo-inc.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> If making Pig Thread safe (i.e.: two threads running a different pig > >>> script) is important then we need to change some of the APIs from > static > >>> singleton access to a dependency injection pattern. > >>> In that case, this should probably be done before 1.0 > >>> For example: UDFContext should be passed to the UDF after construction > >>> (similar to the SevrletContext in Servlet or the way Hadoop passes the > >>> context to tasks) > >>> Also a clearly separated API that does not depend on the Pig > >>> implementation > >>> would help. > >>> For example UDFContext is in org.apache.pig.impl.util when it would be > >>> better in org.apache.pig.api (Or at least an interface defining it) > >>> > >>> Julien > >>> > >>> On 1/24/11 10:14 AM, "Olga Natkovich" <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Guys, > >>> > >>> I think it is time for us to have another meeting. Yahoo would be happy > >>> to > >>> host if this works for everybody. How about Wednesday, 2/9 4-6 pm. > >>> Please, > >>> let us know if you are planning to attend and if the date/time works > for > >>> you. > >>> > >>> Things that come to mind to discuss and as always feel free to suggest > >>> others: > >>> > >>> - Error handling proposal - this might be easier to finalize > >>> face-to-face > >>> - Pig 0.9 plan > >>> - Pig Roadmap beyond 0.9 > >>> o What do we want to do in Pig.next? > >>> o Are we ready for Pig 1.0 > >>> > >>> Olga > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > >
