Bill, Thanks for going through those tickets. I marked them all as 0.10/0.11... 2616 seems like the only critical one, and the others are nice to haves (I imagine 2587and 2574 won't be super critical until we build out the systems that rely on them). All of them look pretty close so I'd have no problem with that.
Hopefully tomorrow others can weigh in on their priorities. Then we can label things, work to finish them, and roll the RC. 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> > Yes, but CI anyway only run unit tests, we will have to run e2e test > by ourselves. > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Jonathan Coveney <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Perhaps a big initiative for 0.11 could be to get the builds to the point > > where flaky tests don't essentially gut the usefulness of the CI server > > (Pig 0.9 hasn't passed in 6 months, etc). I'm not sure how difficult that > > would be though, and what the benefit would be. But it's pretty annoying > to > > be able to wrap up a release when there are a bunch of "known useless" > > tests. > > > > 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> > > > >> Once PIG-2317 check in, only document patch (PIG-2601) and some of > >> Russell's patches left. Before roll up RC, we need to make sure all > >> unit tests and e2e tests pass, I can help with this. > >> > >> Daniel > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Coveney <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > It's time to get serious about rolling an RC. 0.10 seems pretty > strong... > >> > are there any pressing JIRAs that people want to try and get in? > Looking > >> at > >> > the open JIRAs with a fix labeled of 0.10 (which is admittedly > possibly > >> > incomplete), it looks like there isn't anything terribly seriously > >> left... > >> > I'd love to get the ball rolling on an RC so we can test it and > identify > >> > any bugs. > >> > > >> > Thoughts? > >> >
