I think we got everything important in. Am excited On Apr 3, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Daniel Dai <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is everything ready now? Can we start the release process? > > Daniel > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sure, that's fine. >> >> Alan. >> >> On Mar 27, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: >> >>> I agree, Alan, though I think we should make the deadline Monday, 4/2. Most >>> testing is going to happen during the week anyway, and I'd like to give >>> true believers the weekend to fix up anything that is lacking. >>> >>> Sound ok? >>> >>> 2012/3/27 Alan Gates <[email protected]> >>> >>>> I propose we set a deadline and say patches need to be ready by that day, >>>> or they don't go in. Otherwise this time next week there will be another >>>> set of patches people would like to see. I'd say the deadline should be >>>> 3/30 (this Friday). That would mean we could address any final test >>>> failures we see and start rolling the RC next week. >>>> >>>> Alan. >>>> >>>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:00 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: >>>> >>>>> Bill, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for going through those tickets. I marked them all as 0.10/0.11... >>>>> 2616 seems like the only critical one, and the others are nice to haves >>>> (I >>>>> imagine 2587and 2574 won't be super critical until we build out the >>>> systems >>>>> that rely on them). All of them look pretty close so I'd have no problem >>>>> with that. >>>>> >>>>> Hopefully tomorrow others can weigh in on their priorities. Then we can >>>>> label things, work to finish them, and roll the RC. >>>>> >>>>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>> Yes, but CI anyway only run unit tests, we will have to run e2e test >>>>>> by ourselves. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Jonathan Coveney <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Perhaps a big initiative for 0.11 could be to get the builds to the >>>> point >>>>>>> where flaky tests don't essentially gut the usefulness of the CI server >>>>>>> (Pig 0.9 hasn't passed in 6 months, etc). I'm not sure how difficult >>>> that >>>>>>> would be though, and what the benefit would be. But it's pretty >>>> annoying >>>>>> to >>>>>>> be able to wrap up a release when there are a bunch of "known useless" >>>>>>> tests. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Once PIG-2317 check in, only document patch (PIG-2601) and some of >>>>>>>> Russell's patches left. Before roll up RC, we need to make sure all >>>>>>>> unit tests and e2e tests pass, I can help with this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Coveney < >>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> It's time to get serious about rolling an RC. 0.10 seems pretty >>>>>> strong... >>>>>>>>> are there any pressing JIRAs that people want to try and get in? >>>>>> Looking >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>> the open JIRAs with a fix labeled of 0.10 (which is admittedly >>>>>> possibly >>>>>>>>> incomplete), it looks like there isn't anything terribly seriously >>>>>>>> left... >>>>>>>>> I'd love to get the ball rolling on an RC so we can test it and >>>>>> identify >>>>>>>>> any bugs. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>
