Ok, let's cut off the 0.10.0 release. I will start testing during the weekend.
Daniel On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Russell Jurney <[email protected]> wrote: > JRuby and a working AvroStorage. Woohoo! > > Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com > > On Apr 4, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1. Let's roll 0.10. >> >> Alan. >> >> On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:34 PM, Jon Coveney wrote: >> >>> I think we got everything important in. Am excited >>> >>> On Apr 3, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Daniel Dai <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Is everything ready now? Can we start the release process? >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Sure, that's fine. >>>>> >>>>> Alan. >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I agree, Alan, though I think we should make the deadline Monday, 4/2. >>>>>> Most >>>>>> testing is going to happen during the week anyway, and I'd like to give >>>>>> true believers the weekend to fix up anything that is lacking. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sound ok? >>>>>> >>>>>> 2012/3/27 Alan Gates <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I propose we set a deadline and say patches need to be ready by that >>>>>>> day, >>>>>>> or they don't go in. Otherwise this time next week there will be >>>>>>> another >>>>>>> set of patches people would like to see. I'd say the deadline should be >>>>>>> 3/30 (this Friday). That would mean we could address any final test >>>>>>> failures we see and start rolling the RC next week. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Alan. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:00 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bill, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for going through those tickets. I marked them all as >>>>>>>> 0.10/0.11... >>>>>>>> 2616 seems like the only critical one, and the others are nice to haves >>>>>>> (I >>>>>>>> imagine 2587and 2574 won't be super critical until we build out the >>>>>>> systems >>>>>>>> that rely on them). All of them look pretty close so I'd have no >>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>> with that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hopefully tomorrow others can weigh in on their priorities. Then we can >>>>>>>> label things, work to finish them, and roll the RC. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, but CI anyway only run unit tests, we will have to run e2e test >>>>>>>>> by ourselves. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Jonathan Coveney >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Perhaps a big initiative for 0.11 could be to get the builds to the >>>>>>> point >>>>>>>>>> where flaky tests don't essentially gut the usefulness of the CI >>>>>>>>>> server >>>>>>>>>> (Pig 0.9 hasn't passed in 6 months, etc). I'm not sure how difficult >>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> would be though, and what the benefit would be. But it's pretty >>>>>>> annoying >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> be able to wrap up a release when there are a bunch of "known >>>>>>>>>> useless" >>>>>>>>>> tests. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Once PIG-2317 check in, only document patch (PIG-2601) and some of >>>>>>>>>>> Russell's patches left. Before roll up RC, we need to make sure all >>>>>>>>>>> unit tests and e2e tests pass, I can help with this. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Coveney < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> It's time to get serious about rolling an RC. 0.10 seems pretty >>>>>>>>> strong... >>>>>>>>>>>> are there any pressing JIRAs that people want to try and get in? >>>>>>>>> Looking >>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>> the open JIRAs with a fix labeled of 0.10 (which is admittedly >>>>>>>>> possibly >>>>>>>>>>>> incomplete), it looks like there isn't anything terribly seriously >>>>>>>>>>> left... >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd love to get the ball rolling on an RC so we can test it and >>>>>>>>> identify >>>>>>>>>>>> any bugs. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>
