+1. Let's roll 0.10. Alan.
On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:34 PM, Jon Coveney wrote: > I think we got everything important in. Am excited > > On Apr 3, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Daniel Dai <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is everything ready now? Can we start the release process? >> >> Daniel >> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Sure, that's fine. >>> >>> Alan. >>> >>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: >>> >>>> I agree, Alan, though I think we should make the deadline Monday, 4/2. Most >>>> testing is going to happen during the week anyway, and I'd like to give >>>> true believers the weekend to fix up anything that is lacking. >>>> >>>> Sound ok? >>>> >>>> 2012/3/27 Alan Gates <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> I propose we set a deadline and say patches need to be ready by that day, >>>>> or they don't go in. Otherwise this time next week there will be another >>>>> set of patches people would like to see. I'd say the deadline should be >>>>> 3/30 (this Friday). That would mean we could address any final test >>>>> failures we see and start rolling the RC next week. >>>>> >>>>> Alan. >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:00 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Bill, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for going through those tickets. I marked them all as 0.10/0.11... >>>>>> 2616 seems like the only critical one, and the others are nice to haves >>>>> (I >>>>>> imagine 2587and 2574 won't be super critical until we build out the >>>>> systems >>>>>> that rely on them). All of them look pretty close so I'd have no problem >>>>>> with that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hopefully tomorrow others can weigh in on their priorities. Then we can >>>>>> label things, work to finish them, and roll the RC. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, but CI anyway only run unit tests, we will have to run e2e test >>>>>>> by ourselves. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Jonathan Coveney <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Perhaps a big initiative for 0.11 could be to get the builds to the >>>>> point >>>>>>>> where flaky tests don't essentially gut the usefulness of the CI server >>>>>>>> (Pig 0.9 hasn't passed in 6 months, etc). I'm not sure how difficult >>>>> that >>>>>>>> would be though, and what the benefit would be. But it's pretty >>>>> annoying >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> be able to wrap up a release when there are a bunch of "known useless" >>>>>>>> tests. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Once PIG-2317 check in, only document patch (PIG-2601) and some of >>>>>>>>> Russell's patches left. Before roll up RC, we need to make sure all >>>>>>>>> unit tests and e2e tests pass, I can help with this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Coveney < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> It's time to get serious about rolling an RC. 0.10 seems pretty >>>>>>> strong... >>>>>>>>>> are there any pressing JIRAs that people want to try and get in? >>>>>>> Looking >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> the open JIRAs with a fix labeled of 0.10 (which is admittedly >>>>>>> possibly >>>>>>>>>> incomplete), it looks like there isn't anything terribly seriously >>>>>>>>> left... >>>>>>>>>> I'd love to get the ball rolling on an RC so we can test it and >>>>>>> identify >>>>>>>>>> any bugs. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>
