I'd like to get PIG-3558 in, which depends on HIVE-0.13.0 release in weeks. Otherwise I am fine with a Pig 0.13.0 release.
I can wrap a 0.12.1 release in a couple of weeks. Thanks, Daniel On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales <g...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 on releasing a 0.13 and if somebody feels strongly about releasing a > 0.12.1 that fixes PIG-3492 I am +1 on that too. > > -- > Gianmarco > > > On 13 February 2014 03:08, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So I think we agree that we should branch 0.13 at this point, right? >> >> (and possibly look at releasing an incremental bump to 12 or 10? I'm not >> sure what should be included there but I support the general idea). >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Koji Noguchi <knogu...@yahoo-inc.com> >> wrote: >> >> > > Releasing 0.13 and 0.10.1 is totally independent in my opinion >> > > >> > I should have referenced my previous request on including 0.10.1 on the >> > top release page. >> > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@pig.apache.org/msg20629.html >> > >> > > By minor I meant 0.13 >> > > 0.10.1 is a bug fix release. >> > > as in Major.Minor.BugFix >> > > >> > I see. Then I should have said, >> > "but I'd like to request we make BugFix releases more often." >> > >> > Thanks for correcting my mistake. >> > >> > Koji >> > >> > >> > On Feb 6, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Julien Le Dem <jul...@ledem.net> wrote: >> > >> > > Releasing 0.13 and 0.10.1 is totally independent in my opinion. >> > > It just takes the time of a committer that needs the release to happen >> > to do it. >> > > >> > > By minor I meant 0.13 >> > > 0.10.1 is a bug fix release. >> > > as in Major.Minor.BugFix >> > > >> > > Our Major version is still 0 >> > > >> > > On Feb 6, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Koji Noguchi wrote: >> > > >> > >>> To add to the discussion, I think we should release more often, based >> > on time elapsed rather than volume of change. >> > >>> >> > >> I don't have preference on the frequency, but I'd like to request we >> > make minor releases more often. >> > >> >> > >> At this moment, stable pig release (to me) is still 0.10.1. >> > >> 0.11.1 and 0.12.0 both have regression bug PIG-3492 that caused >> > multiple production pig scripts in our clusters to fail randomly. >> > >> (unless user is disabling ColumnMapKeyPrune) >> > >> >> > >> If releasing 0.13 means 0.10.1 gets kicked out from the front release >> > list, I'd like to see minor release on 0.11 or 0.12 first. >> > >> >> > >> Koji >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Feb 6, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Cheolsoo Park <piaozhe...@gmail.com> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> +1 to 0.13 release. Why not if someone is volunteering? >> > >>> >> > >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Julien Le Dem <jul...@ledem.net> >> > wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> To add to the discussion, I think we should release more often, >> based >> > on >> > >>>> time elapsed rather than volume of change. >> > >>>> The more often we release, the easier it is to release. >> > >>>> Also that makes it easier for contributors to use their own >> > contributions >> > >>>> in official releases. >> > >>>> It is also probably a good idea to have a clean starting point >> before >> > >>>> merging the Tez branch >> > >>>> >> > >>>> That said, I think those changes by themselves are enough to >> warrant a >> > >>>> minor release. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Julien >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On Feb 6, 2014, at 12:24 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> Major updates since we release 12 that are currently in trunk: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> - lazy output (don't generate empty part files) >> > >>>>> - jar caching optimization >> > >>>>> - automatic local mode for small job (big wall-clock wins for >> > long-tail >> > >>>>> jobs) >> > >>>>> - improved support for BigInteger, BigDecimal >> > >>>>> - hbase loader improvements >> > >>>>> - debug mode that leaves temp files around for examination (!) >> > >>>>> - fixes to a few nasty bugs (PIG-3641) >> > >>>>> - pluggable execution engine allowing work like Tez and Spork >> > >>>>> - .. and more >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> I'd say this justifies a release. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> D >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Aniket Mokashi < >> aniket...@gmail.com> >> > >>>> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>>> List I mentioned is pending tasks before we can make a release. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> A complete list of contributions can be seen at - >> > >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/CHANGES.txt?view=markup. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Some of the things that make it a good candidate for a release- >> > >>>>>> - PIG-3419 (has several backwards incompatible api changes) >> > >>>>>> - PIG-2672 >> > >>>>>> - PIG-3642 >> > >>>>>> - PIG-3463 >> > >>>>>> - PIG-3511 >> > >>>>>> - PIG-3657 >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Thanks, >> > >>>>>> Aniket >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Olga Natkovich < >> > onatkov...@yahoo.com> >> > >>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Just going by the list that Aniket provided, I don't really see >> > enough >> > >>>>>> for >> > >>>>>>> a full release. Two mentioned JIRAs are doc updates and one is a >> > bug >> > >>>> fix >> > >>>>>>> that was ported into Pig 12. >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 3:13 PM, Aniket Mokashi < >> > >>>>>>> aniket...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Hi All, >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> A good number of improvements and bug fixes have gone into trunk >> > >>>>>> recently. >> > >>>>>>> I'd like to know if we can roll out a Pig 0.13 release around >> > >>>> mid-March? >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> I am aware that we are planning to merge tez branch into trunk >> > soon. >> > >>>>>>> However, making a release before tez branch is merged will be >> > good. Any >> > >>>>>>> objections? >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Following are few jiras we need to wrap up before 0.13 release- >> > >>>>>>> PIG-3591 >> > >>>>>>> PIG-3740 >> > >>>>>>> PIG-3745 >> > >>>>>>> PIG-3347 >> > >>>>>>> PIG-3731 >> > >>>>>>> Any other? >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Thanks, >> > >>>>>>> Aniket >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> -- >> > >>>>>> "...:::Aniket:::... Quetzalco@tl" >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >> -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
