Would it be beneficial to have a virtualbox/docker thing for local testing? If so, I think I have an old Vagrantfile I could polish and contribute.
U On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 at 13:15 sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 November 2016 at 02:30, John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > > > would you want some puppet config to be able to build the box from? and > > would it be possible to grant the PPMC access to the box for manual > testing? > > That's what I am assuming/hoping. > Otherwise it's going to be far less useful. > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:21 PM Gavin McDonald <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > On 11 Nov. 2016, at 1:16 pm, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > Would it be worth setting up a test installation, along with some test > >> data? > >> > > >> > This would allow testing of changes to the code by many more people. > >> > > >> > And would allow people who have reported bugs to see if any fixes work > >> for them. > >> > > >> > I think we should use only public data just in case (we could simulate > >> > some private mails). > >> > > >> > Since the Permalinks could not be guaranteed to work long-term, I > >> > think the button text should also be changed on the box. Maybe the > >> > list ids could be changed as well. > >> > > >> > Thoughts? > >> > >> I think its a good idea. Ask Infra for a test box where a Nightly/Weekly > >> wipe and build of trunk/master > >> can be available with test data. > >> > >> Gav… > >> > >> >
