I was able to get a ubuntu based VM working locally. The install instructions seem to work fine.
The only thing I'm facing now is trying to get my local changes syncing properly to the VM. On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:53 AM Ulises <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it be beneficial to have a virtualbox/docker thing for local testing? > If so, I think I have an old Vagrantfile I could polish and contribute. > > U > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 at 13:15 sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 11 November 2016 at 02:30, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > would you want some puppet config to be able to build the box from? > and > > > would it be possible to grant the PPMC access to the box for manual > > testing? > > > > That's what I am assuming/hoping. > > Otherwise it's going to be far less useful. > > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:21 PM Gavin McDonald <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > On 11 Nov. 2016, at 1:16 pm, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Would it be worth setting up a test installation, along with some > test > > >> data? > > >> > > > >> > This would allow testing of changes to the code by many more people. > > >> > > > >> > And would allow people who have reported bugs to see if any fixes > work > > >> for them. > > >> > > > >> > I think we should use only public data just in case (we could > simulate > > >> > some private mails). > > >> > > > >> > Since the Permalinks could not be guaranteed to work long-term, I > > >> > think the button text should also be changed on the box. Maybe the > > >> > list ids could be changed as well. > > >> > > > >> > Thoughts? > > >> > > >> I think its a good idea. Ask Infra for a test box where a > Nightly/Weekly > > >> wipe and build of trunk/master > > >> can be available with test data. > > >> > > >> Gav… > > >> > > >> > > >
