> As there have been no comments or questions on the discussion thread, I'm > going to move this to a vote: > > Qualities we look for: > > - A candidate must demonstrate an understanding of how our project > is structured and how we work. > > - A candidate must communicate openly about work planned/in-progress. > > - A candidate must demonstrate expertise in a significant area of > the existing code base. > > - A candidate must demonstrate an extended commitment to the > project. > > Tests for these qualities: > > - contacting the right team members to discuss changes > > - actively soliciting feedback for significant changes or new > development > > - multiple independent contributions over a period of several months > > - sponsorship by someone who has worked directly with the candidate > reviewing and committing patches > > - detailed positive feedback from those who have worked directly > with the candidate > > - a record of patches that maintain or improve the quality of the > code without the need for feedback or rework > > Please cast your vote below: > > [ ] Adopt the above statements as our official committership criteria. >
[+1] Adopt the above statements as our official committership criteria.
