Rafael Schloming wrote:
As there have been no comments or questions on the discussion thread,
I'm going to move this to a vote:
Qualities we look for:
- A candidate must demonstrate an understanding of how our project
is structured and how we work.
- A candidate must communicate openly about work planned/in-progress.
- A candidate must demonstrate expertise in a significant area of
the existing code base.
- A candidate must demonstrate an extended commitment to the
project.
Tests for these qualities:
- contacting the right team members to discuss changes
- actively soliciting feedback for significant changes or new
development
- multiple independent contributions over a period of several months
- sponsorship by someone who has worked directly with the candidate
reviewing and committing patches
- detailed positive feedback from those who have worked directly
with the candidate
- a record of patches that maintain or improve the quality of the
code without the need for feedback or rework
14 Binding +1 Votes:
Rob Godfrey
Rafael Schloming
Kim van der Reit
Steve Huston
Robert Greig
Rajith Attapattu
Jonathan Robie
Ted Ross
Martin Ritchie
Alan Conway
Robbie Gemmell
Aidan Skinner
Marnie McCormack
Nuno Santos
2 Non-Binding +1 Votes:
Andrew Stitcher
Sam Joyce
Gordon Sim commented that the first quality should be clarified.
Mick Goulish voted +1 with the caveat that the first quality should be
clarified/removed.
There were no zero or -1 votes.
I believe this passes. I'm not sure what the official rules are around
the caveats, but I'm happy to work to clarify the first quality either way.
--Rafael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
