On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:19 +0000, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Gordon applied this change for the 0.6 release: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=904458&view=rev
> Talking of JIRA, what are peoples thoughts on the version numbers > post-release? Should the 0.7 and 0.8 versions be merged together and > renamed 0.8 ? I think it might be more understandable for users, as > 0.7 was never released. Currently there are items in both 0.7 and 0.8 > versions and I would have to give links to both Release Notes outputs > to get a full picture of whats actually in the 0.8 release. I think that either: * We retrospectively merge 0.7 & 0.8 together in Jira * We make sure that the release notes point to both bugs fixed in 0.7 & 0.8. Merging the revisions seems to lose some information, but I can't think why it'd be important information. It should be said though that with our numbering scheme you;d expect the vast majority of bugs to be fixed in the preceding devel version, although they probably should be targeted at a release version if there is a target. To have many bugs fixed in a release version would mean that there were a lot of blocking bugs that delayed the release. The other way you;d get this situation is if we put out bug fix releases, something we've not done recently at least. Andrew --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
