+1 to that Steve Huston (sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos)
On Aug 27, 2013, at 4:53 AM, "Gordon Sim" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/27/2013 09:24 AM, Phil Harvey wrote: >> Forgive me if I'm ignorant of any formal process for polls, but I'm >> conscious that this discussion has been rumbling on for a while now. Many >> good points have been made. By my reckoning, the tally is: >> >> 1. Remove the dev list entirely >> ==> 3 votes >> >> 2. Keep the dev list but only for traffic not relevant to users of the code >> ==> 7 votes >> >> 3. Keep dev list for some wider set of traffic (please specify criteria you >> believe applies if selecting this option) >> ==> 0 votes >> >> 4. Remove dev and user. Instead use discuss at qpid.apache.org. >> ==> 2 votes >> >> At what point do we come to a conclusion? Personally, I think we should >> close the poll in 48 hours time. > > The conclusion I would come to is that there isn't sufficient support for a > change to the current lists. > > There does seem to be strong agreement that topics of interest to users of > the software would be better discussed on a list that users can be reasonably > assumed to be subscribed to. > > The points of disagreement is really whether a dev list is needed or whether > it just causes confusion and > > So though there are some different views on the ideal situation - mainly > around what different people feel seems most logical, most conventional, > least confusing etc - I think there is a pragmatic path to improvement: use > the user list unless you have a good reason not to. (And assume there is no > need to cross-post!) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
