A point to consider here is that this should also be the place for a future profiler thing, and maybe other less pref-y things... On Jul 11, 2012 6:39 PM, "Robby Findler" <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> Better than "tools", IMO. How about "perf"? Ie, perf/future-visualizer > and perf/optimization-coach/ ? > > Robby > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Vincent St-Amour <stamo...@ccs.neu.edu> > wrote: > > (Performance) tuning? > > > > Vincent > > > > > > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:04:46 -0500, > > Robby Findler wrote: > >> > >> tools seems like too generic of a word. Is there something like > >> "performance-debugging" that isn't so long? > >> > >> Robby > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Vincent St-Amour <stamo...@ccs.neu.edu> > wrote: > >> > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 01:33:02 -0400, > >> > Eli Barzilay wrote: > >> >> Or maybe add a new "tools" collection for other similar things? > >> > > >> > I'm about to push the new version of Optimization Coach (formerly > >> > Performance Report). Since it now works with any language (not just > TR), > >> > it would make sense to move it outside of the `typed-racket' collect. > >> > It would be a good candidate for the `tools' collection. > >> > > >> > Vincent >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
